시장대립적 도시계획의 정당성에 관한 비판적 고찰

• 영문명: A Critical Review on Legitimacy of Urban Planning Qpposed to a Market: Raising Some Questions in the Pro-market Point of View
• 발행기관: 한국지역개발학회
• 저자명: 김홍순(Kim. Heung-Soon)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국지역개발학회지』제18권 제1호, 161~190쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 지역개발
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.03.30

영문 초록

This study critically reviews the legitimacy of urban planning opposed to a market broadly adopted by planners conventionally. This study critically investigates the concepts of market failures and govemment failures for the review. Planners have thought planning to be a powerful altemative of the market. However, this study indicates that planners have often misunderstood or exaggerated the reality of market failures. On the other hand, this study finds that the market is a quite excellent mechanism which is able to intemalize the costs resulting from market failures while planning has several limits and problems in dealing with the market failures. This study identifies that planning as a regulatory policy is budget-consuming and rent-creating, and can infringe the civil liberty. In conclusion, this study insists that urban planning should legitimate its ontological meaning in the new way, which is more market-oriented.

키워드

도시계획의 필요성 (necessity of urban planning) 시장실패 (rnarket failures) 정부실패(govemrnent failure) 시장친화적 도시계획 (pro-rnarket urban planning)