한국의 게임중독 논쟁과 기술 거버넌스, 그리고 기표-정치

• 영문명: Game Addiction Debate in Korea, Technological Governance, and Signifiant-Politics
• 발행기관: 한국컴퓨터게임학회
• 저자명: 이준석(June Seok Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국컴퓨터게임학회논문지』제28권 2호, 11~35쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 공학 > 컴퓨터학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.06.30

영문 초록

According to Johan Huizinga (1949), as a Homo Ludens, man developed play (game) element in our culture during evolution. Roger Caillois (1961) categorized play into four groups: Agon (competition), Alea (probability), Mimicry (roleplaying), and Ilinx (altered perception). Current video/computer games are comprised of one or more of them combined. As these sociologists of game assert, game is one of the most basic and fundamental elements of our culture. However, some gamers become highly immersed in playing games, even to the degree of addiction. In 2013, National Assembly of Korea proposed a bill that would help alcoholics, drug addicts, gambling addicts and video game addicts. This caused huge social debates among experts and lay people. While some experts say that gaming addiction is not a truly existing phenomenon, some people say that we need law to regulate gaming in order to help prevent the addicts. These issues have become a problem of technological governance. This article analyzes 80 researches or so that may help us to learn about the problems and answers of the internet addiction, gaming addiction, and internet game (online game) addiction, or computer games for the youth in general. In order to maintain a well performed technological governance, first we need to know the characteristics of the issue. The author hopes that this article may be a ground study to start the scholastic discussion about the gaming governance in Korea.

목차

ABSTRACT

1. 서론

2. 중독 예방ㆍ관리 및 치료를 위한 법률안(중독예방법)

3. 인터넷게임중독이라는 기술중독은 실재하는가?

4. 토의 및 결론

참고문헌

키워드

Technological Governance Game Addiction Debate Science and Politics Signifiant-Politics