공공부문 부패수준 개선국가와 우리나라의 부패방지정책특징 비교분석

• 영문명: A comparative Analysis of the corruption prevention Policy Between Korea and the Nations Which Successfully Reduced Corruption
• 발행기관: 한국부패학회
• 저자명: 이근주(Lee Geun joo) 김진숙(Kim Jin Suk)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국부패학회보』제15권 제2호, 1~32쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 민법
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.06.30

영문 초록

This study tries to identify more effective institutions and policies for corruption prevention by comparing those of Korea with other nations which successfully reduced corruption in public sector such as Belgium, France and Japan. The analysis showed that, in terms of the factors inside of public administration system, Belgium, France and Japan have more effective institutions for preventing political corruption than Korea. First, those three countries punish the offenders of corruption more severly than Korea. Second, three countries have the specialized office for corruption prevention that cooperate closely with the institutions for investigation of corruption such as justice department. In case of Belgium and Japan, in addition, their offices are endowed with the authority for investigation and punishment. On the contrary, Korea's office of corruption prevention does not have authority for investigation, punishment and prosecution for corruption cases. In terms of the factors outside of public administration system, political factors have influence on the institutions for corruption prevention and reduction of actual corruption.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. 공무원 부패에 대한 연구경향과 주요 결과

Ⅲ. 연구모형 및 연구방법

Ⅳ. 주요국의 공무원 부패방지정책 비교 분석

Ⅳ. 한국의 공무원 부패방지정책 분석

V. 한국과 주요국 부패방지정책의 비교분석

Ⅵ. 결론 및 정책적 함의

<참고문헌>

키워드

부패방지정책(corruption prevention policy) 부패인지지수(corruption perception index) 공공부문(public sector) 비교분석(comparative analysis)