학술논문
현행 전세권저당권의 문제와 개선방안에 대한 고찰
이용수 188
- 영문명
- A study on Problems and Improvements of Present Jeonsegwon Morgaged
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 한상준(Han Sang Joon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第25卷 第2號, 121~146쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2014.12.31
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Under Civil Code Article 371, the settlement of mortgage on leasehold rights("Joensegwon" in Korean) is possible. As a result, a person who has leasehold rights (namely a leaseholder) has been able to get financing using it.
In other words, the leaseholders pay a deposit by 70~80 percent of a house price at once and get the right to use the house and take a benefit from it. Besides, the leaseholders get the credit of return of the deposit with the expiration of a lease, so financial institutions could accommodate them with a loan on the basis of the credit.
That is, the financial institutions set up a mortgage on the leasehold rights under the trust that they could claim preferential payment with the credit of a deposit.
However, it seems that the above system of mortgaged leasehold rights is not used effectively in actual financial transactions.
It results from the fact that the right of preferential repayment cannot be actualized under the precedent in Korea that said the mortgage is subject to lapse because of the termination of a leasehold rights with the expiration of lease. This precedent is illogical in view of the fact that it emphasized only a usufructuary function of the leasehold rights in spit of that Civil Code invest it with a function of security as well.
In the following, to determine why the precedent didn't allow a mortgagee to execute the mortgage on leasehold rights after the expiration of lease, I will examine the legal nature of a mortgage, leasehold rights, and a mortgage on leasehold rights, and the next thing is to examine the stance of academy and precedents on the effective application of the a mortgaged leasehold rights after the expiration of lease, and the last thing is to discuss the way to vitalize the system of a mortgage on leasehold rights.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 전세권의 법적 성질
Ⅲ. 저당권의 법적 성질
Ⅳ. 전세권저당권의 대상목적물과 법적성질
Ⅴ. 전세권의 존속기간 만료와 전세권저당권의 실행 방안
Ⅵ. 전세권저당권의 구제수단
Ⅶ. 결어
참고문헌
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!