자본주의, 정의, 그리고 욕망-생산

• 영문명: Capitalism, Justice and Desiring Production: Derrida, Deleuze, and Legacy of Marx
• 발행기관: 한국비평이론학회
• 저자명: 윤일환(Ilhwan Yoon)
• 간행물 정보: 『비평과 이론』제17권 1호, 45~90쪽, 전체 46쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.06.30

영문 초록

In Specters of Marx, Derrida argues that an adequate critique of the world today must positively appropriate Marx, and yet fundamentally criticize him. His critique of Marx organizes around the central conception of spectrality which is neither living nor dead, neither present nor absent, neither soul nor body, and both one and the other. Derrida claims that in Capital Marx wishes to exorcise the specter of exchange-value from use-value by purifying use-value of commodification. While Derrida argues that Marx wants to chase away ghost, however, he insisted on remaining faithful to and an heir to Marx’s spirit of emancipatory self-critique. He retranscribes Marx’s emancipatory spirit into the project of deconstruction in terms of the messianic justice that like spectrality creates an inexorable fissure or disjointedness at the heart of presence. Derrida’s messianicity is, however, linked to specific and determinate circumstances only as formal conditions of possibility. His analysis does not provide the means for specirying spectrality as a critical category by linking it to social and historical analysis of the empirical phenomena to which his criticism refers. Whereas Derrida locates the emancipatory force in disjointed moment of the messianic justice, Deleuze locates it in the immanent decoding and deterritorialization of capitalism. Following Marx’s analysis of the dynamics of capitalism, Deleuze claims that a wave of decoding and deterritorialization in capitalism frees practices from traditional codes, meanings and qualities. But the emancipatory decoding and deterritorialization effects are always accompanied by opposing recoding and reterritorialization which rebind and rechannel the freed flow onto the family, the State, the nation, and religion. The flows are decoded and axiomatized by capitalism at the same time. Capitalism faces two limits: an absolute, exterior limit that Deleuze calls schizoanalysis and relative, interior limit that is capitalism itself. Capitalist deterritorialization is relative in the sense that whatever capital deterritorializes, it then reterritorializes it. This difference between capitalism and schizoanalysis explains Deleuze’s formula for revolution: we should push it processes of deterritorialization further, not withdrawing from the process but going further to accelerate the process. Revolutionary practice for Deleuze is to push capitalism from a relative deterritorialization to an absolute one.

목차

Ⅰ. 마르크스의 유산-데리다와 들뢰즈

Ⅱ. 마르크스의 존재론과 데리다의 유령론

Ⅲ. 마르크스의 해방 운동과 데리다의 메시아적 정의

Ⅳ. 마르크스의 생산양식과 들뢰즈의 욕망-생산의 세 계기들

Ⅴ. 자본주의의 탈코드화와 들뢰즈의 혁명론

인용문헌

Abstract

키워드

데리다 들뢰즈 마르크스 『마르크스의 유령들』 『앙티-오이디푸스』 자본주의 유령 정의 욕망하는 기계 생산 기관 없는 신체 탈코드화 탈영토화 공리화 Jacques Derrida Gilles Deleuze Karl Marx Specters of Marx Anti-Oedipus capitalism specter justice the desiring machine production the body without organs decoding deterritorialization axiornatization