본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

재물손괴에 있어 친족상도례 적용배제의 불합리성과 그 대안

이용수 168

영문명
The Irrationality and Alternative of Applicable Exclusion of Special Exception to Relatives with respect to Crimes of Destruction and Damage of Property
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
김태수(Kim, Tae-Soo)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제24권 제2호, 172~193쪽, 전체 22쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.06.30
5,440

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Special Exception to Relatives implies that it applies to special treatments to be able to remit a punishment, file a suit, and so on, considering relatives’ identity in case of property crimes between them under the Criminal Act. However, it is contradict that the destruction and damage of property, a misdemeanor, is only punished because it excludes the application of special exception to relatives and the destruction and damage of property with committing felonies such as robbery, extortion, fraud, etc becomes an unpunishable expost facto act which at the same time, applies to special exception to relatives not punished. Therefore, the destruction and damage of property considering equity of other property crimes shall apply to special exception to relatives Crimes infringing one’s body and freedom under the Criminal Act also regulate a charge dropping by victim's consent and crime attaching to victim's charge which accept the limit of the state’s punitive right by means of a victim’s intent, whereas the destruction and damage of another’s property, a misdemeanor, is punished because it does not apply to a crime attaching to victim's charge and charge dropping by victim's consent. Consequently, the destruction and damage of property between no relatives shall apply to a crime attaching to victim's charge and charge dropping by victim's consent, one of which is a crime attaching to victim's charge to apply to it because it is historically a fundamental no criminal act, but currently a criminal act. Originally, it is rational and appropriate for all of the criminal law systems that the destruction and damage of property shall apply to a crime attaching to victim's charge other than a charge dropping by victim's consent when regulated a no criminal act into a criminal act. The charge dropping by victim's consent has priority over a crime attaching to victim's charge with respect to the starting time of the state’s punitive right so that the scope of the self-regulating resolution is close enough between victim and perpetrator. In conclusion, the destruction and damage of property shall be enacted in order to apply to special exception to relatives as another’s property crime to balance equity and fairness with other property crimes and it is natural that the destruction and damage of property which is not related with relatives shall apply to a crime attaching to victim's charge for all of the criminal law system.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 재물손괴 친족상도례 적용배제의 타당성 여부
Ⅲ. 친족상도례 준용과 또 다른 문제점
Ⅳ. 개선방안
Ⅴ. 맺음말
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김태수(Kim, Tae-Soo). (2012).재물손괴에 있어 친족상도례 적용배제의 불합리성과 그 대안. 형사법연구, 24 (2), 172-193

MLA

김태수(Kim, Tae-Soo). "재물손괴에 있어 친족상도례 적용배제의 불합리성과 그 대안." 형사법연구, 24.2(2012): 172-193

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제