본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

The Dilemmas of the Border Theory of José David Saldívar and Gloria Anzaldúa

이용수 35

영문명
발행기관
한국비평이론학회
저자명
Myoung Ah Shin
간행물 정보
『비평과 이론』제16권 2호, 235~268쪽, 전체 34쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 영어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.12.31
6,880

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The intent of this paper is to study how the border theory represented by José David Saldívar and Gloria Anzaldúa is criticized for its dilemma. Slavoj Žižek criticizes multiculturalists’ advocacy of cultural differences, which the border theorists emphasize. Žižek’s dissatisfaction lies in multicultualrists’ failure to focus on the economic class issues in their criticisms. Žižek regards multiculturalists’ openness and their critiques are in default due to their displacement of the issue of class struggle with cultural issues. This paper focuses on the ways this border theory is attacked for its culturalism. Just as Saldívar focuses on the borderlands of the Southwest as “the Lost Land” after the Guadaleupe-Hidalgo Treaty in 1848, Gloria Anzaldúa also regards this area as the homeland of the Chicano/s, the American people of Mestizaje. Saldívar is accused of lacking political awareness of class struggle with his praise of mobility and in-betweenness of the border. Lao-Montes specifically criticizes Saldívar for his lack of concern for the colored people in the States, thus committing the American mainstream ideologies of racism. As for the Chicano studies of Gloria Anzaldúa, she is a harsh critic of white supremacy of American main stream ideology and its gender biases as well. Anzaldúa’s use of mestizaje is a mode similar to Saldívar’s borderlands of in-betweenness. However, Scott Michaelsen and David E. Johnson regard that Anzaldúa commits colonialism by insisting on the Spanish American writing as “a final destination for all world writing” and “othering” the indigenous culture. Scott Michaelsen and David E. Johnson also criticize Anzaldúa’s border theory for her “demonization and repression of a presumed white or Anglo culture”. The rest of the paper will pay attention to overcoming these dilemmas by way of the political logic of Zapatistas.

목차

Introduction: Capitalism, Colonialism and the Border
The Characteristics of the Dilemmas of the Border Theory
The Border Theory of José David Saldívar and Gloria Anzaldúa
Conclusion: Toward a More Concrete Analysis of Capitalism and Coloniality of Modernity
Works Cited
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

Myoung Ah Shin. (2011).The Dilemmas of the Border Theory of José David Saldívar and Gloria Anzaldúa. 비평과 이론, 16 (2), 235-268

MLA

Myoung Ah Shin. "The Dilemmas of the Border Theory of José David Saldívar and Gloria Anzaldúa." 비평과 이론, 16.2(2011): 235-268

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제