학술논문
허사 there의 병합과 이동
이용수 177
- 영문명
- There in [Spec, TP] : via Merge or Move?
- 발행기관
- 한국영미어문학회
- 저자명
- 김동석(Dongseok Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『영미어문학』영미어문학 제101호, 139~156쪽, 전체 18쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2011.12.31
4,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Critically reviewing Chomsky’s (2001, 2004~2005) [Spec, TP] approach to the expletive there, this paper argues for Kim and Lee’s (2004) proposal that expletive there externally merges in [Spec, υP], which is supported by the complementarity of Object Shift and Transitive Expletive Construction, as observed in Richards and Biberauer (2005).
[Spec, υP] analysis is shown to have advantages over [Spec, TP] analysis with respect to the following: There, merged in [Spec, υP], raises to [Spec, TP] like any other formal subject. Since [Spec, υP] is in T’s c-command domain, there can be probed and valued by T like any other nominal. And, like other nominals, it is rendered active by a Case feature. There is, therefore, no need to assume that its defective ø-set is unvalued: its [Person]-feature has default, third-person value, hence it is not entitled to be a probe, contra Chomsky (2005). If there merges inside T’s Agree domain, then the EPP problem in Chomsky’s analysis is also naturally overcome, since it satisfies T’s EPP via Move in the same way that nominal arguments do.
In the current analysis, [Person]-feature of there being interpretable, there is no need to assume, contra Kim and Lee (2004), that there enters Agree with its associate. The Case features of the expletive and its associate are valued via multiple Agree with T, which implies that the two share the same Case. As for the locus of Merge-there, it is argued that there is allowed to merge in [Spec, υP], provided that this position is not occupied by a thematic element (an external argument or causing event). On the observation that only a subset of un-accusative verbs allows there-construction, we specify this to be the specifiers of non-inchoative unaccusatives.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. [Spec, TP] 분석
Ⅲ. [Spec, υP] 분석
Ⅳ. 결론
References
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!