학술논문
UNIDROIT 원칙의 적용규칙에 관한 국제중재 판정사례 연구
이용수 151
- 영문명
- A Case Study of International Arbitration Awards on the Conflict-of-Law Rules in the Application of the UNIDROIT Principles
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 안건형(Keon-Hyung Ahn)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』比較私法 제18권 제4호, 1071~1120쪽, 전체 50쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2011.11.30
8,800원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
With the recent trend of globalization, more companies are engaged in international trades and resultant international commercial disputes. However, parties to these disputes generally prefer arbitration to litigation as the means of resolving their differences. In parallel to the growing prevalence of arbitration in cross-border disputes, the UNIDROIT principles are also increasingly applied as the substantive law to determine such disagreements.
This paper principally discusses application and importance of the UNIDROIT principles in international commercial arbitration by showing statistical analysis of international commercial arbitration awards from the UNILEX database.
Through a private international law analysis, both theoretical and practical perspectives on when and how the UNIDROIT principles are applied in international commercial arbitration can be observed. Such an analysis demonstrates that the UNIDROIT principles are more frequently used in international commercial arbitration than in state-court litigation. This is due in large part to the fact that state-courts tend to apply the conflict of laws rules of the lex fori (being mandatory rules of law) and decides which law to apply based on connecting principles of such conflicting norms. In this case, generally a certain domestic law - rather than transnational law - is likely to be designated as being applicable.
In the context of international commercial arbitration, however, there is a greater chance of a tribunal applying non-national rules of law, including the UNIDROIT principles, in light of the discretion afforded to tribunals by arbitral rules or national arbitration law.
In practice, it was found that there were a considerable number of international arbitration awards in which the UNIDROIT Principles were applied as the subjective applicable law where the UNIDROIT Principles were expressly chosen by the parties or where the parties agreed that their contract would be governed by general principles of law or lex mercatoria or the like.
It was also found upon reviewing international arbitration awards that the UNIDROIT Principles were applied by arbitrators as the objective applicable law in the absence of any choice-of-law clause in the contract, in accordance with the most appropriate conflict of laws rules, or as the most appropriate / most closely connected rules of law to the contract.
Furthermore, in circumstances where non-legal standards were referred to in the contract, such as amiable compositeur or arbitrator(s) deciding ex aequo et bono, or taking account of trade usages or in compliance with the contractual terms, the UNIDROIT Principles were also applied.
Additionally, in reviewing awards, it was also found that the UNIDROIT Principles often play an important gap-filling role in the context of internal or external gaps in the CISG, thereby providing an appropriate principle and criteria of interpretation in this regard.
Such an in-depth case study provides parties involved in international trade, not only with an enhanced awareness of the importance and increasing use of the UNIDROIT Principles in international commercial, but also an in-depth analysis of their interpretation and application in practice.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. UNIDROIT 원칙의 적용 현황
Ⅲ. 국제상사중재에서 UNIDROIT 원칙의 적용근거
Ⅳ. 결론 및 시사점
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- Vereinheitlichung europäischen Vertragsrechts
- 보험목적의 양도에 대한 비교법적 고찰
- 擬制信託(Constructive Trusts)의 理解
- 계약의 해제 및 해지에 관한 민법개정시안(2011년 6월)에 대한 검토와 제안
- 판례에 나타난 ‘특수한’ 손해배상액의 예정과 위약벌
- 농지의 사용ㆍ수익에 관한 비교법적 고찰
- 중소기업의 원활한 사업승계를 위한 방안
- Modernisierung des Kroatischen Vertragsrechts unter dem Beitritt in die EU und Culpa in contrahendo im kroatischen Vertragsrechts
- 대형금융기관(금융지주회사)의 도산처리 방향
- 양도에 의한 선의취득과 선의취득자의 부당이득
- UNIDROIT 원칙의 적용규칙에 관한 국제중재 판정사례 연구
- The Modernization of Contract Law and Culpa in Contrahendo in China
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!