試論 紅山文化 原始龍에 대한 재검토

• 영문명: Primitive Dragon Figurine of Hongshan Culture: Reconsideration on “zhurong” Theory by Shun Su Dao
• 발행기관: 백산학회
• 저자명: 복기대(Bok, Gi-dae)
• 간행물 정보: 『백산학보』第77號, 43~70쪽, 전체 28쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.04.30

영문 초록

The dragon occupies a very important position in all the East Asia countries. Especially, in the ancient times, the dragon was the monopoly of the china, which pretended to Great Country in East Asia. The people of China regarded the dragon as a messenger of the Heaven as well as representative in enforcing the Heaven’s will. There were many concerns where the China dragon was originated. In the middle of that, it was reported that ancient dragon was found in the Hongsan culture. This was firstly suggested by the scholar Su dao, Shun, who believe that the ancient china dragon was originated from the Hongsan culture. However, on the authority of my own presented data, the beast head-shaped jade porcelain, so-called Hog Dragon in Hongsan culture, might be considered as realistic description of ill or pig rather than China Dragon. Above all, the reason is becausethere certainly would be existing fatal errors in the verifying process of Hog dragon at first. The jade porcelain was not a special thing when the Beast-shaped jade porcelain was firstly found in the Wongniuteqi Sanxingtara inner Mongolia. However, judging from the curved dragon found at the Fuhaomu of Yinxu in 1980, which was located in the capital city of late Sang country, the Beast-shaped jade porcelain was determined as the first China dragon after running back of 200 years. Comparing with these two wares, there were too many existing differences, which was originally ascribed in the verifying processes of declaration of dragon. Thus, it would be more reasonable that so-called Hog dragon was, in fact, realistic description of pig or ill but not dragon. If so, our concerning is where the first china dragon was originated from. In this book, I have introduced the relic of Henanseng Fuyangcun Xisuiper, which would be an origin of China dragon by the comparing of multiple evidences structurally. Although this is, of course, not a first suggestion by me but suggested by others continuously, the origin of dragon was not thought to be a sole just because of their historical view and outlook on the world. So, great attention could not be paid the dragon in Fuyangcun. However, I carefully presumed that the China dragon might be originated from a certain place and then dispersed more and more afterwards.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 기록에 나타난 용의 모습

Ⅲ. 홍산문화 ‘猪龍’의 명명과정

Ⅳ. ‘저룡’에 대한 비판적 분석

Ⅴ. 저룡에 대한 새로운 해석

Ⅵ. 용의 기원에 대한 최근의 새로운 견해

Ⅶ. 맺음말

[Abstract]

키워드

홍산문화 돼지 물고기 玉龍 猪龍 Hongsan Culture gem dragon zhurong pig fish