본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

사이드의 휴머니즘론과 이의 한국적 전유

이용수 209

영문명
Edward Said’s Humanism and Its Appropriation to Today’s Korea
발행기관
한국비평이론학회
저자명
고부응(Boo Eung Koh)
간행물 정보
『비평과 이론』제16권 1호, 5~30쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 영어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.06.30
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

‘Human beings’ seem to have disappeared in today’s literary and cultual theories. This is partly because the concept of man or human being is too broad and ambiguous to be included in theoretical discourses. However, the more serious causes of the disappearance can be found in the trend of anti-humanism in recent theories. Human agency is being excluded in the structuralist and post-structuralist understanding of society and history. The historical and political abuse of humanism is another cause of the disappearance. We see such examples in the Nazi’s genocidal violence on Jews and the American invasion into another countries in the name of humanism. In spite of anti-humanistic theories and historical abuses of humanism. the value of human beings cannot be discarded in the study of the human history and society. Edward Said’s Humanism and Democratic Criticism is an attempt to construct a new humanism in which traditional Euro-centric inhumane humanism can be overcome. He says the new humanism’s project is “to be critical of humanism in the name of humanism.” For this, he revives the philological tradition of language studies, and thereby the tradition of humanities. As far as the humanities is the study of human achievements in history, it is the stakeholder of humanism. Consequently, the humanities and humanism cannot be separated from each other. For Said, the new humanism is receptive in that it reserves the tradition of philology and is resistant in that humanists should be critical of today’s inhumane violences of political and economic powers. In order for any imported theory or thesis to be relevant in a given society, it needs to be properly appropriated to the society. A relevant appropriation of Saidian humanism in the Korean society would be to disclose the treacherous humanism of powers, especially transnational capitalistic powers. Today’s Korean society is in need of humanist scholars’ intervention into the widespread political and economic violation of human values.

목차

1. 서론: 왜 휴머니즘인가?
2. 휴머니즘과 인문학
3. 사이드의 휴머니즘론
4. 지금 여기에 있어야 할 사이드의 휴머니즘론 전유
인용 문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

고부응(Boo Eung Koh). (2011).사이드의 휴머니즘론과 이의 한국적 전유. 비평과 이론, 16 (1), 5-30

MLA

고부응(Boo Eung Koh). "사이드의 휴머니즘론과 이의 한국적 전유." 비평과 이론, 16.1(2011): 5-30

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제