‘근대의 표상’으로부터의 이탈과 다원화

• 영문명: Retreat from ‘the Symbol of Modernity’ to Pluralism - Transformation of the Image of British History Reflected in Japanese Modern Historiography -
• 발행기관: 한국사학사학회
• 저자명: 염운옥(Yeom, Woon-Ok)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국사학사학보』제17권, 153~182쪽, 전체 30쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.06.30

영문 초록

This paper aims to trace those changes that has occurred in the Japanese modern historiography in relation to the perception of the characteristics of British history from 1945 until today. In Japanese academic circle there exists a tradition in which the British state and British history were seen as ‘the symbol of modernity’. Especially Ōtsuka Hisao(大塚久雄) and his school, the ‘After War historiography(Sengo Sigaku, 戦後史学)’ in succession to Fukuzawa Yukichi(福沢諭吉)'s vision of ‘the symbol of civilization’, saw Britain as a model which Japan would have to imitate in her pursuit of modernization. Consequently the study of the British history occupied a certain privileged status in the Ōtsuka school because its students thought the historical research in Japan must serve to construct modern democratic society after the defeat of World War Ⅱ. For the Ōtsuka school the study of British history essentially required to transcend the so called Japan's ‘distorted modernity’ and to attain ‘normal modernity’ which they believed were embodied in the British history. However, if we historicize the ‘Sengo Sigaku’ from the post-modern perspective, Ōtsuka's special interests in the British history was nothing but an effort to find out the modern democratic subjects who would voluntarily devote their body and soul to the cause of nation state. In the 1970s a revisionist school, called ‘Re-appraisal Group(Saigento-ha, 再検討派)’ began to attack the Ōtsuka school on the ground that its understanding of world history followed the universal historical law. The group broke up with the Ōtsuka school, saying that the essence of historical knowledge lies not in universality but in particularity. Since the emergence of the group, the position of the British history in Japan changed from ‘a criterion history’ into ‘a history of a region’. Kawakita Minou(川北稔), one of the leading historians among the group, focused on gentlemen as ruling elites in the British society, instead of independent yeomanry who were considered as the pivotal class in charge of capitalization within the Ōtsuka school. There was a remarkable increase in the number of articles and books published in the field of British history since 1990. The imperial history project made by ‘the Japanese Association for the Study of British Imperial and Commonwealth History(イギリス帝国史研究会)’ is especially worth mentioning. The reason for the fruitfulness of imperial history lies in the fact that the British empire held a hegemonic position in the world capitalist system from the end of 18th century till the early 20th century. In a certain sense, the rise of imperial history and global history means the return of the Ōtsuka school's perspective towards the world history, even though not exactly the same. The global history perspective today tries to deconstruct national boundaries and reconstruct them into trans-national history. Thus, the image of Britain is deviated from ‘the symbol of modernity’ and turns to diversity in the studies of social history and imperial history. The paper tries to draw attention to the recent developments as such in Japanese historiography now under way.

목차

1. 서 론

2. 오츠카 히사오의 ‘전후 역사학’과 영국사의 위상

3. 1970년대 ‘재검토파’의 등장과 사회사 연구

4. 1990년대 이후 연구경향의 다원화와 제국사 연구

5. 결 론

키워드

영국 근대성 오츠카 전후 역사학 사회사 재검토파 제국사 Britain modernity Ō tsuka After War historiography(Sengo Sigaku) social history Re-appraisal Group(Saigento-ha) imperial history