학술논문
“두 세계 사이에” : 미들튼 머리와 T S 엘리엇의 모더니티 논쟁
이용수 136
- 영문명
- “Between Two Worlds” : J Middleton Murry and T S Eliot on Modernity
- 발행기관
- 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소
- 저자명
- 김태철(Tae-Chul Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『영미연구』제22집, 3~39쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.06.30
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This essay reads as the critical discourse of modernity the interactions between John Middleton Murry and T S Eliot in the literary journals of the Adelphi and the Criterion in the 1920s, through which approach their debate proves to be no other than diametrically different versions of modernity recognition, and then modernity project, between two worlds. Their controversies can be sorted out into two groups by topics and roughly in time sequence: in the first round of the debate, they form their own different conceptions of classicism and romanticism with the help of the other’s arguments, which serves as the frames of reference for the next one; now in the second, exploring the human soul under modernity, they seek for the possibility of a synthesis between romantic intuition and classical intelligence. Over this debate, the British empiricist Murry identifies romanticism with modernity itself dating back to the Renaissance, and then presents as his project of modernity a fuller realisation of romanticism of his own idiosyncratic understanding. Which is to say a new synthesis of intuition and intelligence into enlightened reason in allusion to the mediaeval Thomist synthesis of reason and faith. On the other hand, the Euro-centric rationalist Eliot expects much of classical intelligence for romanticism to be overcome, and for classical ideals to be restored or, more precisely, for the unified sensibility to be regained and for the integrated intelligence to be revived, which means he is in resolute and unshakable pursuit of a project of modernity. In the course of their eight-year-long interactions, it transpires, Murry elaborates on the recognition of modernity rather than on its project, and Eliot does the other way round. In other words, both of them fail to represent their contemporary stage of ever-deepening modernity fully enough in their discourse of modernity. Theirs remain as unfinished projects of modernity.
목차
글머리에
I. 고전주의와 낭만주의
II. 영국적 속성
III. 고전적 지성과 낭만적 직관 코다
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 현대 생성통사론 연구의 전망과 방향
- Cognate Objects and the Case
- 공백화(Gapping), 의사공백화 (Pseudogapping), 동사구생략(VPE)구문의 비교분석
- A Contrastive Study of Compliment Responses of Korean, Chinese and English Speakers
- 영국의 행정입법 통제와 의회민주주의
- “두 세계 사이에” : 미들튼 머리와 T S 엘리엇의 모더니티 논쟁
- DP in Copular Sentences
- 워즈워스의 상실과 회복의 전략
- Volatility and Growth
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!