UCP 600상 제2통지은행(Second advising bank)의 적용과 관련된 문제점과 대응책

• 영문명: Some problems and counter measures for application of a second advising bank under UCP 600 Article 9(c)
• 발행기관: 한국무역연구원
• 저자명: 한상현(Sang-Hyun Han)
• 간행물 정보: 『무역연구』제6권 제2호, 73~88쪽, 전체 16쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.06.30

영문 초록

An Letter of Credit(L/C) or its amendments may be advised through another bank which is normally the beneficiary’s bank. The bank another bank which receives the L/C from the first advising bank and advises it to the beneficiary, is called the second advising bank. Whilst the use of, and reference to, a second advising bank has been practice for a number of years, the UCP never previously acknowledged its role. The new Article 9 (c) states that the second advising bank has much the same role as the advising bank in satisfying itself as to the apparent authenticity of the advice that it has received from the advising bank, and that its advice of the documentary credit or amendment accurately reflects the advice of the documentary credit or amendment received from the advising bank. This study analyzes UCP 600 Article 9 (c) introduced the concept of a second advising bank. and i wish to present point and confrontation plan concretely to keep in mind issuing bank, notifying bank, and negotiating bank regarding interpretation and application of this Article 9 (c).

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 신용장과 조건변경의 통지 및 UCP 600상 통지은행의 의무

Ⅲ. UCP 600상 제2통지은행규정의 신설과 제2통지은행의 진정성 확인

Ⅳ. UCP 600상 제2통지은행의 적용과 관련된 문제점

Ⅴ. 결론 ～실무상의 대응책～

참고문헌

키워드

UCP 600 L/C(letter of credit) Second Advising Bank Advising Bank