허사 There구문에서의 병합과 이동

• 영문명: Merge and Move in the expletive There constructions
• 발행기관: 한국외국어대학교 영미연구소
• 저자명: 주치운(Chiwoon Joo)
• 간행물 정보: 『영미연구』제21집, 167~197쪽, 전체 31쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2009.12.30

영문 초록

The goal of this article is to investigate Chomsky's (1998, 2001) claim that Merge is preferred over Move both conceptually and empirically and his feature-checking motivation in successive-cyclic movement. However, contrary to Chomsky's claim, Shima(2000) proposes that Move is selected over Merge in both conceptual and empirical respects and Bosˇkovic´(2007) suggests that there is no feature checking in intermediate positions of successive-cyclic movement. In this article, following and revising Shima's(2007) and Bosˇkovic´'s(2007) analyses, I try to propose a revised analysis on the expletive There constructions in English. Put it briefly, the expletive There has a Nominative Case and is introduced into a derivation for the Nominative Case checking. And There has a clitic property, so that it must be generated only in the presence of the indefinite NP associate. And it is also verified that There should be generated in the surface position not by Move, but by Merge. The indefinite NP as an associate could bear Partitive Case only when the expletive There included in the numeration set is generated in the surface position. In case the expletive There is not included in the numeration set, the associate could not be assigned Partitive Case. In that case, the associate should move to the position where a structural Case could be checked.

목차

1. 서론

2. 병합(Merge), 일치(Agree)와 이동(Move)

3. 병합과 이동의 재해석

4. 이동의 국부성과 동인 분석

4. 대안 및 결 론

인 용 문 헌

Abstract

키워드

Merge Move Phase numeration set Phase Impenetrability Condition 병합 이동 국면 배번집합 국면 불 침투 조건