본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

컴퓨터 압수ㆍ수색의 문제점

이용수 101

영문명
Considering Search and Seizure of Computer
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
박용철(Park Yong-Chul)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제20권 제2호, 129~148쪽, 전체 20쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2008.01.25
5,200

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  General warrants for search and seizure should neither be issued nor be executed. Warrants, as one of most intrusive means to interfere with a person"s privacy, banning general warrants is the top priority that the law enforcement should give a lot of weight to. The Principle has been embodied to detailed rules such as (1) the warrants for search & seizure should specify the objects, place to be searched and seized, (2) the warrant should be issued and executed upon probable cause.
  The traditional notion on search and seizure of things does not show the prefect fit when it comes to the application to computer search and seizure. The fundamental reason of such clash is the evidence the law enforcement can get out of computer search and seizure is totally different from the traditional search and seizure. Computer, as a means to store tons of information, is not an easy ‘place" that you can find any viable evidence if you only stick to the traditional way of searching and seizing the evidence. Computer search and seizure has been done using different methods. While practicing such new methods, the law enforcement has met the situation where general warrants is much more in need. The current warrant for search and seizure seems to be broken which cannot be applied to computer evidence. However, obviously, this new attempt cannot be allowed for the sake of protection of a person"s privacy. In the end, computer search and seizure has become a new frontier that not many scholars and lawyers should give great input to.
  In Korea, probably the methods used to search and seize the computer related evidence is likely to be simliar to the ones used in the United States. Also the requirement that the object and place for search and seizure should be specified as noted in the rules of the United States. However, there is no specific notion on probable cause when the Warrant is being issued and executed. That is a partial reason making any exception to the warrant requirement in regards to computer search and seizure. Without probable cause the law enforcement is forcefully tied to observing the warrant word by word. A new set of rules to solve the computer search and seizure should be introduced.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 압수ㆍ수색영장의 발부 및 집행
Ⅲ. 컴퓨터 압수ㆍ수색
Ⅳ. 맺음말
〈Abstract〉

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박용철(Park Yong-Chul). (2008).컴퓨터 압수ㆍ수색의 문제점. 형사법연구, 20 (2), 129-148

MLA

박용철(Park Yong-Chul). "컴퓨터 압수ㆍ수색의 문제점." 형사법연구, 20.2(2008): 129-148

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제