학술논문
포스트모던 과학교육의 정당화 - Lyotard를 중심으로
이용수 117
- 영문명
- The Justification of Postmodern For Science Education - Focused Lyotard
- 발행기관
- 한국교육철학회
- 저자명
- 정석환(Chung Seok-Hwan)
- 간행물 정보
- 『교육철학』敎育哲學 第33集, 255~286쪽, 전체 32쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 교육학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2007.12.30
6,640원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The purpose of this thesis is to examine The Postmodern theory of Science Education and its meanings in education. Specifically, This thesis focuses on The construct of the theory of Postmodernism and its implications in Science education. Conclusions are as follows.
In the field of Modern Science education the induction of training and technology according with the system"s performance becomes more valuable. But the ascendancy of performative underestimates a person"s freedom and value, independent of system. Postmodern Philosophy criticizes every metanarratives, like system theory operating under this performative principle in that it entails a kind of terror to make the incommensurable commensurable. To fight successfully against the terror of metanarratives, Postmodern theory of Science Education introduces a form of legitimation grounded on paralogy. Paralogy is a sphere that philosopher embodies the logic of dissent, not one that expert pursues consensus.
we can find a case to apply the sublime as aim of postmodern education to individual subject in science education. The science theory, according to Lyotard, accepts the relativity of space-time and is open to possibility of changes. This happens when we apply the difference principle to the science. If we are to enforce the critical mind to come over the traditional paradigm, we should consider that the knowledge of science has the characteristic of error, reform, and not-lasting. The purpose of science education is to support scientific attitude, critical thinking, and the habit of construction through the active learning. In other words, it encourages new moves and possibilities of other purposes within one system. Also, not excluding other voices, it accepts the possibility of various utterances and strengthens patience to tolerate difference.
In the field of Modern Science education the induction of training and technology according with the system"s performance becomes more valuable. But the ascendancy of performative underestimates a person"s freedom and value, independent of system. Postmodern Philosophy criticizes every metanarratives, like system theory operating under this performative principle in that it entails a kind of terror to make the incommensurable commensurable. To fight successfully against the terror of metanarratives, Postmodern theory of Science Education introduces a form of legitimation grounded on paralogy. Paralogy is a sphere that philosopher embodies the logic of dissent, not one that expert pursues consensus.
we can find a case to apply the sublime as aim of postmodern education to individual subject in science education. The science theory, according to Lyotard, accepts the relativity of space-time and is open to possibility of changes. This happens when we apply the difference principle to the science. If we are to enforce the critical mind to come over the traditional paradigm, we should consider that the knowledge of science has the characteristic of error, reform, and not-lasting. The purpose of science education is to support scientific attitude, critical thinking, and the habit of construction through the active learning. In other words, it encourages new moves and possibilities of other purposes within one system. Also, not excluding other voices, it accepts the possibility of various utterances and strengthens patience to tolerate difference.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 모더니즘 과학의 철학적 배경
Ⅲ. 모더니즘의 과학교육
Ⅳ. 포스트모던 과학교육의 정당화
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
Ⅱ. 모더니즘 과학의 철학적 배경
Ⅲ. 모더니즘의 과학교육
Ⅳ. 포스트모던 과학교육의 정당화
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 장자(莊子)에 있어 ‘자연적 교육관’
- 1907년 평양대부흥운동이 사회교육에 미친 영향
- 동양의 교육 전통에서 ‘배움’의 의미 - 원시유학의 논의를 중심으로
- 退溪의 子女敎育論 - 寄安道孫을 中心으로
- 명화감상활동의 인식론적 고찰과 교육적 적합성
- 포스트모던 과학교육의 정당화 - Lyotard를 중심으로
- 장횡거(張橫渠) 性論 고찰을 통한 窮理ㆍ盡性의 교육이론적 意義
- 교원평가의 목적에 대한 비판적 고찰
- 『교육철학』게재논문 총목록 (창간호~32집)
- 한국 사찰 주련(柱聯)의 교육적 소고(小考)
- 플라톤의 교육적 이상(理想)으로서의 프쉬카고기아
- 총체적 이상에 비추어 본 관심의 교육적 의미
- 한국교육철학회 연구윤리규정
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!