최근 미연방대법원의 판례를 통한 중재합의조항 분리원칙(Doctrine of Separability)의 재평가

• 영문명: Reappreciation of the Doctrine of Separability through the Recent U.S. Supreme Court Case
• 발행기관: 한국국제상학회
• 저자명: 하충룡(Choong-lyong Ha)
• 간행물 정보: 『국제상학』國際商學 第21卷 第3號, 155~177쪽, 전체 23쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.09.01

영문 초록

  As an u.s. Supreme Court Case has been released in the doctrine of separability of arbitration agreement, it would be meaningful time to investigate how the doctrine of separability in arbitration is applied in the U.S. and what are legal issues around the separability doctrine and the history of its development.
  There are two kinds of nullity causes on the underlying contract - voidable and void ab initio. Such dichotomy have been found to give at least somehow viable explanatory power to generalize the nullity causes of underlying contracts based on which the separability doctrine can be applicable though not complete. The separability doctrine has been compared among several arbitration laws and rules. Some discrepancies among the rules have been found in the intensity of arbitrators" jurisdictional power.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중재합의조항 분리원칙(Doctrine of Separability)
Ⅲ. 중재합의조항 분리원칙의 적용범위
Ⅳ. 여타 중재법 및 중재규칙과의 비교
Ⅴ. 시사점 및 결론
참고문헌

키워드

Doctrine of Separability Arbitration Gause Arbitration Agreement