학술논문
불교의 언어 비판과 그 극복
이용수 452
- 영문명
- The Buddhist Critique of Language and Attempts to Overcome the Limits of Language
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 명법(Myeong-beop) 주성옥(Chu Song-ok)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제9호, 55~85쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.12.01
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Language from religious perspective is problematic in two ways, that is, language cannot capture the truth nor can it bring about religious practice. Especially Zen Buddhism whose motto is "Nondependence on language(不立文字)" criticizes all the kinds of linguistic activities because it considers them a hindrance in ascetic practices.
According to the Buddhist view of language, language has no essence in itself, and the meaning of words and sentences is a borrowed objectivity and a sign of belief. Semantic theory assumes that a word corresponds to a reality in the external objective world; so this theory establishes a skewed metaphysics. Buddhism considers that the cognitive process through language is most difficult to control; it brings about the great confusion about the nature of objects.
Since Buddhist Scriptures(Sutra) are made of words, they also share the limits of language. So the difficulty of Buddhist Scriptures is that they must describe the real aspects of the world and bring about practical changes of being. If the language of Sutra did not adequately describe cognitive truth, it would not function to deliver sentient beings from their sufferings. Above all to function sorteologically it is necessary to describe the cognitive truth. To overcome the limits of ordinary language, Buddhism developed many kinds of expressions like metaphors, negative expressions in Praj??p?ramit?-s?tra and M?dhyamaka, Koan(公案) in Patriarch Zen.
Metaphors are the way through which the concepts, that are difficult to apprend directly or are otherwise complicated and abstract, are likened to familar concrete figures. Metaphors transform a concept into an object of intuition and make it understood as a concrete thing presented in front of our eyes. But with metaphors the rational thinking processes, that is, the analysis and inference are involved when they likens properties of a certain metaphor with an abstract concept. Thus as Dign?ga classified, metaphors are a type of indirect cognition which cannot overcome the limit of language.
Praj??p?ramit?-h?daya-s?tra and M?dhyamaka use negative expressions to criticize Abidharma that defines and classifies dharmas which compose the elements of existence. C?tu?ko?ika used by Nagarjuna eliminates everything defined by words to escape from realistic tendency of human thinking and to express the structure of interdependent-arising. Emptiness(??nyat?) is just an instrument and a borrowed name that announces the fact that there is no entity in itself. Emptiness denies not only all the things but also itself. In other words, Nagarjuna"s concept of Emptiness denies itself as an ultimate principle. Through this double negation, Nagarjuna affirmed language as a borrowed-name(praj?apti) in relative realm.
The critique of language made by Nagarjuna is dialectic not because it negates language entirely but because it uses language to criticize language. But Nagarjuna"s negative dialectic does not aim at logical thinking. It seeks to extend our ability to understand ways of thinking. If we realize through analysis and destruction of the process of thinking that there is nothing, we can correct the fiction that we by ourselves make and exclude a delusion. So realizing Emptiness plays a definitive role in ultimate liberation. It is the answer to every question, not because the answer is found but because the question is not a question any more.
The role of Koan in Patriarch Zen is to reveal mind itself through self-negation. To escape from "vikapa" of ordinary language, Koan gives an answer which contradicts the question. So in the dialogue between the master and his disciple, Koan is presented as a self-negation, in other word, a paradox. Koan makes the activities of discriminative consciousness cease. It negates a disciple"s question and destroys the semantic structure
According to the Buddhist view of language, language has no essence in itself, and the meaning of words and sentences is a borrowed objectivity and a sign of belief. Semantic theory assumes that a word corresponds to a reality in the external objective world; so this theory establishes a skewed metaphysics. Buddhism considers that the cognitive process through language is most difficult to control; it brings about the great confusion about the nature of objects.
Since Buddhist Scriptures(Sutra) are made of words, they also share the limits of language. So the difficulty of Buddhist Scriptures is that they must describe the real aspects of the world and bring about practical changes of being. If the language of Sutra did not adequately describe cognitive truth, it would not function to deliver sentient beings from their sufferings. Above all to function sorteologically it is necessary to describe the cognitive truth. To overcome the limits of ordinary language, Buddhism developed many kinds of expressions like metaphors, negative expressions in Praj??p?ramit?-s?tra and M?dhyamaka, Koan(公案) in Patriarch Zen.
Metaphors are the way through which the concepts, that are difficult to apprend directly or are otherwise complicated and abstract, are likened to familar concrete figures. Metaphors transform a concept into an object of intuition and make it understood as a concrete thing presented in front of our eyes. But with metaphors the rational thinking processes, that is, the analysis and inference are involved when they likens properties of a certain metaphor with an abstract concept. Thus as Dign?ga classified, metaphors are a type of indirect cognition which cannot overcome the limit of language.
Praj??p?ramit?-h?daya-s?tra and M?dhyamaka use negative expressions to criticize Abidharma that defines and classifies dharmas which compose the elements of existence. C?tu?ko?ika used by Nagarjuna eliminates everything defined by words to escape from realistic tendency of human thinking and to express the structure of interdependent-arising. Emptiness(??nyat?) is just an instrument and a borrowed name that announces the fact that there is no entity in itself. Emptiness denies not only all the things but also itself. In other words, Nagarjuna"s concept of Emptiness denies itself as an ultimate principle. Through this double negation, Nagarjuna affirmed language as a borrowed-name(praj?apti) in relative realm.
The critique of language made by Nagarjuna is dialectic not because it negates language entirely but because it uses language to criticize language. But Nagarjuna"s negative dialectic does not aim at logical thinking. It seeks to extend our ability to understand ways of thinking. If we realize through analysis and destruction of the process of thinking that there is nothing, we can correct the fiction that we by ourselves make and exclude a delusion. So realizing Emptiness plays a definitive role in ultimate liberation. It is the answer to every question, not because the answer is found but because the question is not a question any more.
The role of Koan in Patriarch Zen is to reveal mind itself through self-negation. To escape from "vikapa" of ordinary language, Koan gives an answer which contradicts the question. So in the dialogue between the master and his disciple, Koan is presented as a self-negation, in other word, a paradox. Koan makes the activities of discriminative consciousness cease. It negates a disciple"s question and destroys the semantic structure
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 불교 언어관의 이중성
Ⅲ. 경전의 언어 사용의 특징
Ⅳ. 선종의 언어
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
영문초록
Ⅱ. 불교 언어관의 이중성
Ⅲ. 경전의 언어 사용의 특징
Ⅳ. 선종의 언어
Ⅴ. 맺는 말
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 6세기 신라에서의 왕권과 불교 간의 관계
- 『대승열반경』의 보살사상
- 『金藏論』에 대하여
- 円測の三轉法輪說について
- 貞慶と高弁 - その思想的交流をめぐって
- 초월적 실재로서의 일심(一心) - 윌프레드 캔트웰 스미스의 불교관에 비추어본 대승기신론 이해
- 불전언해의 몇 가지 문제
- 艸衣 意恂의 茶禪思想
- 7세기 후반 신라불교의 사상적 경향
- 『現觀莊嚴論光明』におけるHaribhadraの『八千頌般若経』註釋態度について - 『最上心髄』におけるRatnAkarazAntiの態度と比較して
- 불교학연구회 활동일지(2004. 7~12) 외
- 불교의 8식설을 통한 동기유발 통합이론 개발 가능성
- 상수멸정(想受滅定)의 성취에 관한 일고찰 - 니까야(Nikāya)를 중심으로
- 불교의 언어 비판과 그 극복
- Zen Buddhism and Western Scholarship - Will the Twain Ever Meet?
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!