학술논문
『능엄경』에 나타난 마음의 논증 분석
이용수 404
- 영문명
- An Analysis of The Arguments on The Existence of Mind in Surangamasutra
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 주성옥(Chu Song-Ok)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제13호, 97~129쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.04.30
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In Surangamasutra, Buddha denied our common belief that Mind exists in Body. We believe that the Self is composed of Body and Mind in Body. We separate Mind as Subject from World as Object and regard Mind as consciousness. This belief results in the conviction of the existence of the Self that brings about many sufferings in life. In order to be delivered from sufferings we should know that there exists no Mind.
In the discourse with Buddha, Ananda argued that the Mind exists in Body and other six places. Ananda"s belief about the existence of Mind in Body is similar to Descartes" Mind-Body theory. Against his opinion, Buddha presented counter-examples. In this argument Buddha used Nagarjuna"s reduction to absurdity and Dignaga"s Buddhist Logic. He concluded that there is not Mind in seven places. His conclusion does not mean that there is nothing. According to his argument, if there is nothing we have no conscience as the wood and the rock do not when we are delivered from the worldly existence. But Buddha didn"t deny the existence of the true Mind, namely Tath?gatagarbhav?din. In order to show the existence of true Mind, his argument first denied the Existence of Mind.
The analysis of Mind in Buddhism is very similar to the modern Philosophy of Mind because both of them equally regard Mind not as Entity of a single quality but as a collection of psychological phenomena. But Functionalism explains that the psychological world is based on the physical world. So it reduces Mind to the physical functions. It also misunderstands the dependent rising in Buddhism as the relations of cause and effect. Above all Functionalism presupposes the existence of Mind. Seen In this respect, it differs from Buddhism.
In the discourse with Buddha, Ananda argued that the Mind exists in Body and other six places. Ananda"s belief about the existence of Mind in Body is similar to Descartes" Mind-Body theory. Against his opinion, Buddha presented counter-examples. In this argument Buddha used Nagarjuna"s reduction to absurdity and Dignaga"s Buddhist Logic. He concluded that there is not Mind in seven places. His conclusion does not mean that there is nothing. According to his argument, if there is nothing we have no conscience as the wood and the rock do not when we are delivered from the worldly existence. But Buddha didn"t deny the existence of the true Mind, namely Tath?gatagarbhav?din. In order to show the existence of true Mind, his argument first denied the Existence of Mind.
The analysis of Mind in Buddhism is very similar to the modern Philosophy of Mind because both of them equally regard Mind not as Entity of a single quality but as a collection of psychological phenomena. But Functionalism explains that the psychological world is based on the physical world. So it reduces Mind to the physical functions. It also misunderstands the dependent rising in Buddhism as the relations of cause and effect. Above all Functionalism presupposes the existence of Mind. Seen In this respect, it differs from Buddhism.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ.『능엄경』의 특징
Ⅲ. 마음의 논증
Ⅳ. 마음에 대한 서양철학의 몇 가지 이
Ⅴ. 맺음말
영문초록
Ⅱ.『능엄경』의 특징
Ⅲ. 마음의 논증
Ⅳ. 마음에 대한 서양철학의 몇 가지 이
Ⅴ. 맺음말
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 근대불교의 지향과 굴절 - 梵魚寺의 경우를 중심으로
- 불교학연구회 활동일지(2006. 1~4) 외
- 『능엄경』에 나타난 마음의 논증 분석
- 초기경전에 나타난 망상(papañca)에 대한 일고찰
- 동아시아 불교의 두 얼굴 - 다원주의와 본질주의의 공존
- Tribute to Venerable Ānanda -A Unique Ritual by the Buddhist Nuns of Japan-
- 初期佛敎의 自我觀에 대한 심신가치론적 고찰 - 몸과 마음의 성격 및 지위에 대한 논의
- 《찰나멸논증》의 인용 출처를 통해 본 라뜨나끼르띠의 후기 유가행파에서의 위치
- 天台智顗의 圓頓止觀에서 方便의 의미
- 신라불교 문헌으로서의『起信論一心二門大意』
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!