학술논문
『현정론』과『유석질의론』의 삼교론
이용수 514
- 영문명
- The Theory Of The RelationshipBetween Buddhism And ConfucianismIn Hyonjongnon and Yusogjiluilon
- 발행기관
- 불교학연구회
- 저자명
- 박해당(Park Hye-Dang)
- 간행물 정보
- 『불교학연구』제10호, 171~201쪽, 전체 31쪽
- 주제분류
- 인문학 > 불교학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.04.01
6,520원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Hyonjongnon and Yusogjiluilon were written to justify Buddhism aganinst the argument of anti-Buddhism which flourished during the period from late Koryo(918-1392) to early Choson(1392-1910) by Confucian intellectuals. In the same context, the relationship between Confucianism and Buddhism was discussed in these treatises.
According to them, the teachings of Confucianism and Buddhism were not different in their essence. However, they regared the two as differing ideologies in their function, but Buddhism over Confucianism, For them, Confucianism, a this-worldly vehicle, was inferior to Buddhism because the former functioned to civilize people, but lacked the ability to lead them to spiritual liberation ; in contrast, Buddhism, the other-worldly vehicle, was superior to Confucianism because the former enabled the people to attain spiritual liberation.
Accordingly, the fundamental theory of the relationship between Buddhism and Confucianism of them was designed on the dual framework of the sameness in essence and the difference in 현정론 과 유석질의론 의 삼교론 201 function, but in the context of the former over the latter.
But there are some differences among Between these two treatises on the idea of the relation between the five disciplines of Buddhism and the five virtures of Confucianism, the understanding of the Concept of Nature, the attiute of dealing I-Ching and the theory of the incarnation of three Buddhist Saints in China, etc.
In Conclusion, It seems evident that the writers of these two treatieses are not same, and there were various views on the relationship between Buddhism and Confucianism in Early Choson Buddhist community.
According to them, the teachings of Confucianism and Buddhism were not different in their essence. However, they regared the two as differing ideologies in their function, but Buddhism over Confucianism, For them, Confucianism, a this-worldly vehicle, was inferior to Buddhism because the former functioned to civilize people, but lacked the ability to lead them to spiritual liberation ; in contrast, Buddhism, the other-worldly vehicle, was superior to Confucianism because the former enabled the people to attain spiritual liberation.
Accordingly, the fundamental theory of the relationship between Buddhism and Confucianism of them was designed on the dual framework of the sameness in essence and the difference in 현정론 과 유석질의론 의 삼교론 201 function, but in the context of the former over the latter.
But there are some differences among Between these two treatises on the idea of the relation between the five disciplines of Buddhism and the five virtures of Confucianism, the understanding of the Concept of Nature, the attiute of dealing I-Ching and the theory of the incarnation of three Buddhist Saints in China, etc.
In Conclusion, It seems evident that the writers of these two treatieses are not same, and there were various views on the relationship between Buddhism and Confucianism in Early Choson Buddhist community.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ.『현정론』과『유석질의론』에 보이는 삼교론의 기본틀
Ⅲ.『현정론』과『유석질의론』의 차이점
Ⅳ. 맺음말 : 평가와 의미
영문초록
Ⅱ.『현정론』과『유석질의론』에 보이는 삼교론의 기본틀
Ⅲ.『현정론』과『유석질의론』의 차이점
Ⅳ. 맺음말 : 평가와 의미
영문초록
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!