법화경에 나타난 增上慢의 사상적 연원과 그 정체성 고찰

• 영문명: Review for the meaning of Shangha"s history of Adhimana(增上慢) in the Sutra of the Lotus
• 발행기관: 불교학연구회
• 저자명: 차차석(Cha Cha-seok)
• 간행물 정보: 『불교학연구』제4호, 129~150쪽, 전체 22쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 불교학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2002.06.01

영문 초록

  We can found a specialised charcter in the Sutra of the Lotus of review about Adhimana(增上慢) that the criticism for belief of Lotus Sutra is the feature for some opposition party criticise thier opposition party by thier own standard. The Sutra regards these memeber make a big group and blame their good conduct is pretended truth and critices as them the memeber of Sravaka(성문승)
  then. Is it possible that we can regrad the member of adhimana as a opposition party for belief of Lotus Sutra(법화행자). We cannot found out the Mahayanayae Buddism in the Abidharma Buddhism. There are a lot of blames for Hinayana Buddism in the early stage of Mahayanayae Buddism material and many scholar regard that this is a shift way to achieve thier orthodoxy while campaign a new Buddism movement.
  We can found that there was a acute struggle between the old order and new order. While new order launched campagin for the purpose of take the poewer that was proceed by oriented for belief of Pagoda(불탑신앙). New order and old drder had great struggle to take thier friendly supporter. It was beyond the real world and very serious situation.
  we can define that the Mahayanayae Buddhist tried to achieve thier orthodoxy while campaign a new Buddhism movement get the launched thier campaingn m. in the same standard, acoring to the Chapter of Skilfulness(방편품), belief of Lotus Sutra regards thier opposion party as Adhimana and claimed that they will fall into Narake. They are pseudo religion and fake.
  in the 『小品般若經』 or 『道行般若經』, the remnant of a system of the Prajna Sutra, we cannot see the clue that they are directly regarded as Adhimana. some characterised group are named them as same as a Adhimana group. we can also see the same formation in the Sutra of the Lotus. In the same of the Pan-prajna Sutra, we can see the fact that there were Shangha of Abidharma and they were blame the Mahayana Sutra as a pseudo religion in the 『小品般若經』, 『小品般若經』, 『般舟三昧經』, 『遺日摩尼寶經』. In review above fact, we can draw a fact that it is possible to presume the belief of Lotus Sutra is a group as they opposite the Buddhist movement or Buddhist ideology. There were member of 5,000 were appeared the Chapter of Skilfulness in the Sutra of the Lotus. and they are classified as a member of Adhimana.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 諸經論에 出現하는 增上慢 關聯 資料
Ⅲ. 『법화경』에 출현하는 增上慢의 性格
Ⅳ. 『법화경』에 출현하는 增上慢의 敎團史的 意義
English Summary

키워드

법화경 방편품 증상만 대승불교운동 부파불교 비구승단 정통성