학술논문
契約解除에 관한 比較法的, 立法論的 課題 - 민법개정안의 문제점과 올바른 개정방향을 중심으로
이용수 170
- 영문명
- Task and Problems of Withdrawal from Agreement in Aspects of Comparative Law and Legal Policy - Concentrating on the Problem with the Amendment of the Korean Civil Code and Correct Direction for Its Amendment -
- 발행기관
- 한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
- 저자명
- 廷基榮(Yeun Kee-Young)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비교사법』비교사법 제11권 4호(상), 39~78쪽, 전체 40쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.12.01
7,600원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper attempted to first introduce the flow of the theories and precedents on the withdrawal set forth in Korean Civil Code, then present the problems in the provisions related to the withdrawal and the termination of the agreement and the correct amendment plan for those provisions.
First of all, it was emphasized that the legal relationship in the withdrawal from an agreement should be understood as an organized body in the perspective of extending the original agreement relationship, in the interpretation of the law currently in force. In case of an obstacle in the performance, the legal relationship should be viewed as a whole trust relationship until all legal relationships are settled, while being cleared from the binding force of the agreement relationship. Therefore, this paper clarified its position in the standpoint of the theory of relationship settlement, in explaining the pre-conditions and the effects of the withdrawal.
On the other hand, in discussing the interpretation of the law currently in force and the task in the theory of legislative law, it was recognized that a study and examination in the perspective of comparative law was necessary with much interest in the international norm and the unification of private law. Such will be a natural conclusion considering the characteristic of the universality and the internationalism of the agreement law. Such data as CISG of the United Nations, which is to be held effective from March 1, 2005, with the ratification of the Korean government, the proposal for the international unification of the private law which is being developed mainly by UNIDROIT, and EG-Richtlinie, the legislative guide of EU, etc.. specially are considered important for the task of legal interpretation and legal amendment, in order to runside by side with the internationalization trend. The content of BGB (the German Civil Code). which has commenced since 1978 and has been put in force since 2002, is another incontestably important material for study in the perspective of comparative law.
In particular, this paper proposes much reference to be made to the legislative materials on the amendment of the civil code in German, while examining the previously announced amendment of the Korean Civil Code. This amendment of the Korean Civil Code may be highly valued for its attempt to unify and modify the existing provisions in general, yet it lacks much study and examination in the perspective of comparative law, in depth. I expect. particularly, a study in the perspective of comparative law on the German Civil Code, which has revived with a new civil code for the twenty-first century, CISG of the United Nations, the proposal for the international unification of the private law which is being developed mainly by UNIDROIT, the law on the withdrawal from agreement as set forth under EG-Richtlinie, etc., and also expect it to be reflected in the amendment of the Korean law on the withdrawal from agreement. However, a future study in the perspective of comparative law through interchange and cooperation within Asian legal boundary, such as Japan and China, is also very important.
First of all, it was emphasized that the legal relationship in the withdrawal from an agreement should be understood as an organized body in the perspective of extending the original agreement relationship, in the interpretation of the law currently in force. In case of an obstacle in the performance, the legal relationship should be viewed as a whole trust relationship until all legal relationships are settled, while being cleared from the binding force of the agreement relationship. Therefore, this paper clarified its position in the standpoint of the theory of relationship settlement, in explaining the pre-conditions and the effects of the withdrawal.
On the other hand, in discussing the interpretation of the law currently in force and the task in the theory of legislative law, it was recognized that a study and examination in the perspective of comparative law was necessary with much interest in the international norm and the unification of private law. Such will be a natural conclusion considering the characteristic of the universality and the internationalism of the agreement law. Such data as CISG of the United Nations, which is to be held effective from March 1, 2005, with the ratification of the Korean government, the proposal for the international unification of the private law which is being developed mainly by UNIDROIT, and EG-Richtlinie, the legislative guide of EU, etc.. specially are considered important for the task of legal interpretation and legal amendment, in order to runside by side with the internationalization trend. The content of BGB (the German Civil Code). which has commenced since 1978 and has been put in force since 2002, is another incontestably important material for study in the perspective of comparative law.
In particular, this paper proposes much reference to be made to the legislative materials on the amendment of the civil code in German, while examining the previously announced amendment of the Korean Civil Code. This amendment of the Korean Civil Code may be highly valued for its attempt to unify and modify the existing provisions in general, yet it lacks much study and examination in the perspective of comparative law, in depth. I expect. particularly, a study in the perspective of comparative law on the German Civil Code, which has revived with a new civil code for the twenty-first century, CISG of the United Nations, the proposal for the international unification of the private law which is being developed mainly by UNIDROIT, the law on the withdrawal from agreement as set forth under EG-Richtlinie, etc., and also expect it to be reflected in the amendment of the Korean law on the withdrawal from agreement. However, a future study in the perspective of comparative law through interchange and cooperation within Asian legal boundary, such as Japan and China, is also very important.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 현행 한국민법상 해제, 해지제도의 구조
Ⅲ. 법정해제권의 발생원인과 귀책사유의 문제
Ⅳ. 법정해제권의 행사와 효과
Ⅴ. 민법개정안의 내용과 입법론적 과제
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【ABSTRACT】
Ⅱ. 현행 한국민법상 해제, 해지제도의 구조
Ⅲ. 법정해제권의 발생원인과 귀책사유의 문제
Ⅳ. 법정해제권의 행사와 효과
Ⅴ. 민법개정안의 내용과 입법론적 과제
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
【ABSTRACT】
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 간행사
- 학회활동 현황(2004. 1.1 - 2004. 11.30) 외
- 각국의 직업선택의 자유와 실질적 보장에 관한 노동법상 고찰
- 公法上 排出許容基準의 私法上 意味
- 海外로 不法搬出된 文化財의 民事法上 返還請求法理에 관한 硏究
- 瑕疵損害, 擴大損害 및 瑕疵와 무관한 結果損害에 관한 類型論的 考察 - 독일의 論議를 중심으로
- 형성권 논의의 의미
- 損害賠償法의 指導原理와 機能
- 契約解除에 관한 比較法的, 立法論的 課題 - 민법개정안의 문제점과 올바른 개정방향을 중심으로
- 動產擔保權의 登錄閱覽
- 獨逸 法學 理論 硏究의 成果와 敎訓: 라렌쯔의 「社會定型的 行爲論」
- 沈默에 의한 意思表示
- 독일의 제조물안전법과 제조물책임
- 동산의 선의취득을 위한 양수인의 점유취득 - 점유개정에 의한 인도의 경우를 중심으로
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!