동북아 각국의 중재판정부 구성에 대한 비교법적 고찰

• 영문명: Comparative Legal Study on the Construction of Arbitral Tribunal in Northeast Asian Nations
• 발행기관: 한국국제상학회
• 저자명: 최석범(Seok-beom Choi) 이용근(Yong-keun Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『국제상학』國際商學 제20권 제2호, 279~303쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2005.06.01

영문 초록

Arbitration has become very popular in resolving international commercial disputes. Arbitration has advantages in that it is convenient, cost-saving and efficient in concluding cases. Arbitration allows the parties full autonomy and can resolve disputes independently, impartially and without delay. It is also preferred for its flexibility, confidentiality, finality and enforceability of its award. More parties have come to choose and adopt arbitration for dispute resolution. Though Northeast Asian economies are extremely diverse, they have achieved high levels of growth due to a stable economic environments and outward-oriented economic policy reforms. As Northeast Asia has been risen as big bloc in the world and trade volume has been increased steadily, disputes will be increased in the future. Therefore, this paper deals with arbitral tribunal in Northeast Asian Nations' arbitration laws in view of comparative law.

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 선행연구분석 및 동북아 각국 중재법의 대상

Ⅲ. 동북아 각국의 중재판정부의 구성

Ⅳ. 동북아 각국의 중재판정부의 구성의 종합비교 및 시사점

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌