본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

사법부 개혁의 올바른 방향

이용수 168

영문명
Reformation of The Judicature
발행기관
한국헌법학회
저자명
김승환(Kim Seung-Hwan)
간행물 정보
『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第10卷 第4號, 9~43쪽, 전체 35쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2004.12.01
7,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

So many years have passed since the reform of the judiciary branch became a demand of the times. The direction of the reform of it is that the judiciary branch which is entirely closed and is full of elite sentiment is enforced to become the power for the people. We have to reinforce the democratic legitimation of the judiciary branch by opening the people as a sovereign the way to participate subjectively in the judiciary. Now we should not admit the attempt to protect the judiciary branch isolated from the people by sticking to the literal interpretation of the provisions of the constitutional law or the laws(e. g. the Court Organization Act) regarding the judiciary power. The judiciary branch is the agency to protect the fundamental rights of the people. So the people must be able to access easily to the judiciary power. Whatever(e. g. the right to counsel) makes the judicial accessability of the people difficult has to be reformed for the benefit of the people. The judiciary perfectionism, which thinks the judge has such an omnipotent ability in the judgment of the things or the legal judgment that he or she doesn't need anyone else's help, is only a kind of creating a myth which is far from the judiciary practices. The judge could declare a right decision about a case first when he or she equips himself or herself with the professional ability and receives the help from the other experts. The Independence of the judiciary branch consists of the internal and external ones. But it is astonishing that the judiciary branch itself has been maintaining for a long time the system and the malpractice which infringe the internal independence. The unconstitutional situation which the core of the judiciary power is ignored has been taking place without any control. When the provision of the constitutional law which regards every judge as a constitutional organ can be applied strictly, the judiciary branch could be situated as what it ought to be.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 사법부의 민주적 정당성의 강화
Ⅲ. 기본권 보장을 위한 사법권의 재편
Ⅳ. 전문성 강화를 위한 사법부의 재편
Ⅵ. 맺으며
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김승환(Kim Seung-Hwan). (2004).사법부 개혁의 올바른 방향. 헌법학연구, 10 (4), 9-43

MLA

김승환(Kim Seung-Hwan). "사법부 개혁의 올바른 방향." 헌법학연구, 10.4(2004): 9-43

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제