본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

美國 聯邦大法院의 權限과 그 限界 ―司法審査權을 中心으로―

이용수 98

영문명
The Power of U.S. Supreme Court and It's Limitation With Special Reference to the power of Judicial Review
발행기관
한국헌법학회
저자명
강승식(Kang Seung Sik)
간행물 정보
『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第10卷 第4號, 533~588쪽, 전체 56쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2004.12.01
9,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Judicial review is one of the distinctive features of United States constitutional law. It is no small wonder, then, to find that the power of the federal courts to test federal and state legislative enactments and other actions by the standards of what the Constitution grants and withholds is nowhere expressly conveyed. But it is noteworthy that its legitimacy has been accepted generally on the grounds of separation of powers and federalism, while there still has been detractors about its doctrinal basis and its application. But in the United States constitutional system in which there is a written constitution, the practice of judicial review inherently has limitation and this limitation is given Justiciability Doctrine under the Article Ⅲ. The term Justiciablity Doctrine refers to a body of judicially created doctrines that define and limit the circumstances under which an Aricle Ⅲ federal court may exercise its constitutional authority, including its authority to engage in judicial review. These doctrines are derived in part from an interpretation of Article Ⅲ's case or controversy requirement, and in part from prudential policy considerations involving perceptions of proper role of the federal judiciary within the constitutional structure of government. They are applied and developed through the lens of four specific doctrines ―the doctrines of standing, ripeness, mootness, and political questions― each of which is designed, at least in part, to ensure that Article Ⅲ courts do not become embroiled in matters of a nonjusticiable nature that would take a federal court beyond the sphere of activity commonly associated with judging.

목차

Ⅰ. 聯邦司法府 權限 一般論
Ⅱ. 司法審査의 理論的 根據
Ⅲ. 司法審査의 限界
Ⅳ. 聯邦大法院 地位의 變化
Ⅴ. 司法積極主義와 司法消極主義
Ⅵ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

강승식(Kang Seung Sik). (2004).美國 聯邦大法院의 權限과 그 限界 ―司法審査權을 中心으로―. 헌법학연구, 10 (4), 533-588

MLA

강승식(Kang Seung Sik). "美國 聯邦大法院의 權限과 그 限界 ―司法審査權을 中心으로―." 헌법학연구, 10.4(2004): 533-588

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제