학술논문
미국의 의회 입법권과 위헌법률심사제의 상호관계
이용수 182
- 영문명
- The Interrelation between the legislative power of Congress and the power of the Court to review laws passed by Congress in the U.S.
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 석인선(Seok InSun)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第10卷 第3號, 511~551쪽, 전체 41쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.09.01
7,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The relationship between the federal Judiciary and Congress is critical to establishing democratic governance, The Judiciary seeks an environment respectful of Its independence. Congress seeks a judicial system that faithfully construes the laws of the legislative branch and efficiently discharges Justice, Governance m the United States is a process of interaction among institutions-legislative, executive, and judicial- with separate and sometimes clashing structures, purposes, and interests, The founders envisioned that constructive tension among those governmental institutions would not only preserve liberty but would also promote the public good, No branch was to encroach upon the prerogatives of the others, yet in some sense each was dependent upon the others for its sustenance and vitality And that interdependence would contribute to an informed and deliberative process Governance is premised on each institution's respect for and knowledge of the others and on a continuing dialogue that produces shared understanding and comity Congress and the Supreme Court are separate but interdependent branches of the federal government, The Supreme Court defines the
limits of congressional authority, while Congress confirms the court's members, sets its jurisdiction and pays its bills Just as the court has used its Judicial review powers to influence the shape of federal legislation, so Congress has tried time to time to use its powers over the court to influence the outcome of particular rulings In deciding whether or not to invalidate an act of a coordinate legislative body, a
court inevitably must choose between competing social policies Lawmaking is the core decision-making process of a democratic state It is the means for defining, promoting, and regulating community life, In the context of the policymaking process, the interplay of Congress and the courts has vital ramifications for the administrative state itself. How Congress and the Court interact has implications beyond those branches: the nature of that relationship affects the shape and development of policy In that sense, the question is how the Judiciary and the legislative work as they shape pohcy outcomes
This article explores the interrelation between the legislative power of Congress and the power of the Court to review laws passed by Congress Chapter II overviews the legislative power of Congress and the power of the Court to review laws passed by Congress in the U S
constitutional law It contains overviews on the legislative power of Congress, Judi챠al review of the Court and their constitutional law basis Then, this chapter exammes the interrelation and the interplay between both powers,
Chapter ill describes the normative standards m assessing the interrelation between the legislative power of Congress and the power of the Court to review laws passed by Congress This chapter examines the inherent power shaping the legislation of Congress and the democratic justification of Judicial review, And It explores who the authoritative interpreter of the constitution should be In addition, it examiines the debates of the separation of powers In pohtlcal institu?tions Its exploration contains the debates about the traditional role of Congress and judiciary, Judicial actIvIsm and Judicial restraint,
Chapter IV searches for finding Its niche in setting up the relation-ship between the power of Congress and Judicial review,
This article concludes that relationship between the Court and Con-gress should depend upon a shared understanding of the mutual obli-gations of the branches and the simultaneous need to preserve judi-cial independence as well as to recognize the leg-t-mate role of the legislature
목차
Ⅰ. 문제의 제기
Ⅱ. 미국헌법상 의회 입법형성권과 위헌법률심사제
Ⅲ. 의회 입법권과 위헌법률심사제 관계평가의 규점적 기준
Ⅳ. 의회의 입법형성권과 사법심사의 적소
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 憲法裁判所 決定에 의한 幸福追求權의 具體化
- 국정감사ㆍ조사제도의 재조명
- 프랑스에서 違憲法律審査請求의 取下-1996년 12월 30일 n˚96-386 1996년 추가경정예산법률 사건을 중심으로-
- 미국의 의회 입법권과 위헌법률심사제의 상호관계
- 국회의사절차의 헌법상 쟁점과 과제
- 헌법재판에서 소수의견표시제에 관한 연구
- 통치행위에 관한 소고
- 직장내 이메일(e-mail) 감청과 프라이버시
- 國家의 社會的 義務
- 한국 여성의 프라이버시권리에 관한 연구
- 대의정에서의 시민단체의 존재 의의와 한계35)
- 집회의 자유-“집시법”과 “서울광장조례”를 중심으로-
- 방송수신료의 법적성격과 인터넷방송에 대한 부과의 문제-독일에서의 논의를 중심으로-
- 국회의원의 면책특권ㆍ불체포특권 제한입법의 헌법적 한계
- 헌법상 기본권과 칸트 및 헤겔의 법철학
- 헌법재판소의 수인의무-구체적 규범통제절차에 있어서 독일연방헌법재판소의 실무를 고찰하며-
- 日本의 明治憲法上 天皇의 法的地位
- 헌법상의 남북관련조항에 관한 연구-헌법 제3조와 제4조의 헌법해석론 관점에서-
- 국회위원회제도의 이론적 탐색과 개선방안
- Modern Technology and the Rule of Law; Focusing on Need of New Cyber Ethics
- 中國의 2004年 憲法改正의 分析
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!