학술논문
직장내 이메일(e-mail) 감청과 프라이버시
이용수 203
- 영문명
- E-mail intercepting and privacy in the workplace
- 발행기관
- 한국헌법학회
- 저자명
- 권형준(Hyung Jun Kwon) 허순철(Soon Chul Huh)
- 간행물 정보
- 『헌법학연구』憲法學硏究 第10卷 第3號, 271~306쪽, 전체 36쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.09.01
7,120원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
E-mail is a convenient and financially beneficial tool In the work-place. Although businesses that take advantage of e-mail have experienced many benefits. these same businesses also face a number of disadvantages. One such disadvantage is the legal liability that employers may face for the e-mall-related actions of their employees
Recognizing these problems. employers are now using surveillance software. known as 'spyware' that can capture every keystroke a user types at a computer. or take screen shots at regular intervals of everything a computer user does Including Web-based e-mail activity
Employers give three main reasons for electronically monitoring employee e-mail use minimizing liability. avoiding reduction In employee productivity. and protecting company assets
There is a fundamental difference between company-controlled. company-provided e-mail accounts and personal. web-based accounts. each system has a different host or origrnator In a company system. the employer controls and usually hosts the system on a company server. In a pelsonal e-mail system. an independent provider. such as Yahoo 01 Hotmall. stores the e-mall on its server.
In response to the lack of privacy afforded company e-mail accounts. many employees choose to conduct their personal affairs via web-based. personal e-mall accounts that are typically available through Internet access provided by the employer But web-based accounts may not isolate an employer from liability. most companies In the US, therefore, seek the ability to mom tor web-based, per?sonal e-mall accounts as well
The U,S, courts examining common law privacy claims related to the e-mail monitoring have generally sided with employers, holding that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in a company-maintained, proprietary e-mail account, These decisions are based on three primary rationales,
First, the courts have focused on the fact that e-mails are sent and received via the company, proprietary e-mail system, Employees are using the company's property while on company time Using a computer and server that belong to another tends to decrease one's expectation of privacy in the use of such devices Second, the courts point to the fact that e-malls sent via company e-mail systems are open to forwarding by a third party which diminishes any expectation of privacy with regard to e-malls Even in cases where companies allowed employees to create folders for the e-mail or utilize password protection for their accounts, the courts still hold that this does not create a reasonable expectation of privacy, Finally, the courts turn to the level of offensiveness that the intrusion would impose on a reasonable person The courts have suggested several reasons why employee suits would not pass this hurdle, The courts take into account an employer's Justifications and Interests in monitoring, and have often determined that the legitimate business Interests of a company achieved by monitoring far outweigh an employee's privacy concerns Such legitimate business interests Include avoiding workplace discrimination or investigating theft or illegal activity
The courts also stress the fact that all computers used to store, send, and receive the e-malls are owned by the employer, and are
thus company property These factors have led courts to conclude that an employer monitoring employee e-mall messages on a proprietary company system, for legitimate purposes, does not rise to the level of being highly offensive to a reasonable person The courts and the legislatures in the U S are one step belimd in interpreting and creating laws that will adequately reflect the interaction between computer technology and society
However, the legal interpretation or protection should be distmguished between company-controlled, company-provided e-mail accounts and personal. web-based accounts because there is a fundamental difference m technology, the web-based account e-mails are not automatically
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 이메일 계정의 유형과 이메일 감시기술의 발달
Ⅲ. 미국에 있어서의 직장내 이메일감청 현황과 관련 법제도
Ⅳ. 우리나라에 있어서의 직장내 이메일 감청현황과 관련 법제도
Ⅴ. 직장내 이메일감청에 관한 법적 문제
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 憲法裁判所 決定에 의한 幸福追求權의 具體化
- 국정감사ㆍ조사제도의 재조명
- 프랑스에서 違憲法律審査請求의 取下-1996년 12월 30일 n˚96-386 1996년 추가경정예산법률 사건을 중심으로-
- 미국의 의회 입법권과 위헌법률심사제의 상호관계
- 국회의사절차의 헌법상 쟁점과 과제
- 헌법재판에서 소수의견표시제에 관한 연구
- 통치행위에 관한 소고
- 직장내 이메일(e-mail) 감청과 프라이버시
- 國家의 社會的 義務
- 한국 여성의 프라이버시권리에 관한 연구
- 대의정에서의 시민단체의 존재 의의와 한계35)
- 집회의 자유-“집시법”과 “서울광장조례”를 중심으로-
- 방송수신료의 법적성격과 인터넷방송에 대한 부과의 문제-독일에서의 논의를 중심으로-
- 국회의원의 면책특권ㆍ불체포특권 제한입법의 헌법적 한계
- 헌법상 기본권과 칸트 및 헤겔의 법철학
- 헌법재판소의 수인의무-구체적 규범통제절차에 있어서 독일연방헌법재판소의 실무를 고찰하며-
- 日本의 明治憲法上 天皇의 法的地位
- 헌법상의 남북관련조항에 관한 연구-헌법 제3조와 제4조의 헌법해석론 관점에서-
- 국회위원회제도의 이론적 탐색과 개선방안
- Modern Technology and the Rule of Law; Focusing on Need of New Cyber Ethics
- 中國의 2004年 憲法改正의 分析
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!