본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

내부고발자 보호제도의 법적 문제점

이용수 256

영문명
On Legal Problem in the Protection of the Whistleblowing
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
최정학(ChoiCheongHak)
간행물 정보
『형사정책』형사정책 제15권 제1호, 315~339쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 정책학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2003.06.01
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In this essay, I aim to define the “whistleblowing” and the legal need to protect it. Moreover, I review the present prescriptions of the Korean law and their problem in critical perspective. The problem can be sum- marized as follows. Firstly, the present legal prescriptions do not provide the enough protection for the whistleblower. Particularly, the decision of the Committee Against Corruption does not have any enforcing effect. This is to be considered as a serious defect, because the prompt and sufficient legal protection is essential in “the Protection of the Whistleblowing.” Secondly, we have to reconsider the criminal responsibility of the whistleblower. Possibly, there are some whistleblowing cases which can also be violation of the Criminal Law. It is not very clear, however, that this kind of whistleblowing is a crime. Futhermore, we have some justifications which exempt the criminal responsibility of the whistleblower such as the Article 20 of the Criminal Law. Thirdly, on the financial reparations for the whistleblower, there is a critical opinion pointing that the rate and maximum of it is too low. Although this new prescription is not common in other legal systems- therefore, we can say that this is a quite progressive and even brave act -, but, too small reparations do not give enough motivation to stimulate whistleblowing and allow the objection that the law use egoistic economic desire. Fourthly and finally, there is a ethical limit in “the Protection of the Whistleblowing.” At first, whistleblowing which is untrue cannot be protected. Moreover, the private vengeance, even if it seems to be a whistleblowing, is not to be protected, either. For these two cases, we can say that the individual harm resulted from the whistleblowing exceeds the public interest which is the aim of “the Protection of the Whistleblowing.”

목차

1. 서론
2. 내부고발자 보호제도의 의미 및 필요성
3. 부패방지법상의 내부고발자 보호제도 및 그 문제점
4. 결론
ABSTRAC

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

최정학(ChoiCheongHak). (2003).내부고발자 보호제도의 법적 문제점. 형사정책, 15 (1), 315-339

MLA

최정학(ChoiCheongHak). "내부고발자 보호제도의 법적 문제점." 형사정책, 15.1(2003): 315-339

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제