학술논문
지젝의 대타자와 실재계의 윤리
이용수 917
- 영문명
- Slavoj Zizek's Conception of the Other and His ethics of the Real.
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- 김용규(Yong-gyu Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제9권 제1호, 81~115쪽, 전체 35쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2004.06.01
7,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This article tries to examine Slavoj Zizek's concept of the Other and his ethics of the Real. Slavoj Zizek`s theory depends upon the later Lacan's theory, which placed a special emphasis on the conception of the ReaL Experiencing a theoretical turn in the 1960s, Lacan shifted his focus "from the dialectics of desire to the inertia of enjoyment (jouissance), from the symptom as coded message to the sinthome as letter permeated with enjoyment, from the 'unconscious structured like a language' to the Thing in its heart, the irreducible kernel of jouissance that resjsts all symbolization." This turn means that Lacan came to think the role of the Real to be more important than that of the Symbolic, which had played a very important role in the former Lacan's theory. Now, the Real is deemed as the most important element which can support the symbolic order itself and at the same time make it impossible. It is that which resists the attempt of the Symbolic to contain it and causes a crack in the Symbolic. In particular, it enables us to rethink society because society is found to be based upon such crack and void. Through the Real, we can know how society is constructed and what is the absolute freedom. The ethics of psychoanalysis lies in finding such void in symbolic order and facing them earnestly.
Zizek makes the Lacanian theoretical turn as his own starting point. In the Symbolic order. the subject is divided and alienated because he loses contact with thing itself and his desire is replaced by language by entering
into the symbolic order of language. As a result, his desire is constructed by the symbolic order and cannot be filled for ever. The subject takes the forced status within the symbolic order and is desiring the desire of the Other. Once we, however, puts the status of the Real over the others, the existing thought should be inversed. The symbolic order of the Other can be no more stable and fu]1. It gets fundamentally unstable because it is that which relies upon the void and crack of the Real.
In Zizek' opinion, it is the lack of the Other, not the divided subject that constitutes thf' most radical dimension in Lacan's theory. Along with the turning of the Symbolic to the Real, the conception of the Other is fundamentally changed. It is crossed out by the fundamental void and impossibility as in the case of subject. The Other is found to be inconsistent and constituted around the traumatic kernel and lack. In psychoanalysis, the analysand can get over his transference by doubting the fantasy that the analyst knows much more than he does. As in the psychoanalysis of overcoming transference to the process of subjectivation, the inconsistences of the Other gives the subject the opportunity to go beyond the alienation and achieve the separation from the desire of the Other. If the Other were consistent and perfect, it would be closed, and the subject would not encounter himself and his desire by being eternally alienated in the symbolic order. The inconsistence of the Other shows that the Other is blocked, desiring and doesn't have the final word. According to Zizek, the lack of the Other gives the subject 'a breathing space' and enables the subject to avoid the total alienation by allowing him to identify himself with the lack in the Other.
For Zizek. the lack of the Other is a starting point for explaining the ethics of psychoanalysis and the Real. The subject's fantasy is to avoid the inconsistence of the Other and fill in its lack. It tries to avoid facing the lack of the Other (the Real). In particular, what is problematic in the subject's fantasy is that the subject's desire is not his but the Other's desire. The subject enjoys the Other's desire as his desire without knowing that his
desire is forced by the obscene desire of the Other. After all, the ethics of psychoanalysis is to teach the subject how to recognize his true desire, not the desire of the Other. For Zizek, the ethics of the Real is to
목차
1.서론
2.지젝의 대타자와 초자아의 외설적 욕망
3.실재의 윤리와 행위-선을 넘어서
4.결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 영원히 지워지지 않는 흔적:줄리아 크리스테바의 모성적 육체
- 들뢰즈의 타자 이론
- 호미 바바의 탈민족주의와 이산적 상상력
- 두보이스의 범아프리카주의와 아프리카 민족해방운동
- 문학의 경제, 선물의 경제
- 에이햅의 숭고와 그 너머: 라깡의 정신분석학적 윤리와 미학을 통한 접근
- 시뮬라이크르의 진리: 시각적 사유의 탈시각적 모험-플라톤에서 들뢰즈까지
- 지젝의 대타자와 실재계의 윤리
- The Animal's Gaze and Shame of Humanity in Derrida
- 메를로-뽕띠(Merleau-Ponty)의 현상학적 신체론과 페미니즘
- 시각의 지울 수 없는 얼룩: 라캉의 응시의 위상학
- 신화상징학파와 새로운 미국학의 등장
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!