본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

유치권 및 저당권설정청구권에 관한 민법개정안

이용수 54

영문명
The Korean Civil Code Revision Draft for the Possessory Lien and the Right to demand the Registration of Mortgage
발행기관
한국민사법학회
저자명
윤진수(Jinsu Yune)
간행물 정보
『민사법학』제63-1호, 193~234쪽, 전체 42쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회과학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2013.06.30
7,840

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The Korean Civil Code grants the possessory lien to certain types of creditors. According to the Code, the creditor has a right to remain in possession of the property under the lien until the debtor has satisfied his or her debt. The possessory lien on an immovable, however, has been criticized for its adverse aspects. Critics’ arguments are twofold. To begin with, the possessory lien on an immovable is not registered in the register. Hence, other creditors such as registered mortgagees have difficulty recognizing the existence of the possessory lien. This is detrimental to certainty of transaction. Further, the requirement of the possession of an immovable by the possessory lien creditor leads to inefficient result, since no one is entitled to use the immovable in an efficient manner once the possession is taken. Against this backdrop, the Civil Code Revision Committee of the Department of Justice has prepared the Korean Civil Code revision draft to address this issue. The outline of the draft is as follows. Firstly, the possessory lien on an immovable is no longer allowed except when an unregistered immovable is at issue. Even in this exceptional case, the creditor must demand the registration of mortgage within 6 months after an immovable is registered. Once registered, the mortgage is deemed to have existed from the time when the debt is due. Secondly, the creditor who had made certain expenditure on an registered immovable can demand the registration of the mortgage without the consent of the debtor or the owner of the immovable. This registered mortgage has the same effect as other registered mortgages. This means that the mortgagee cannot assert his or her mortgage over other prior mortgages. The above draft is now under its way to final legislation.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 유치권 제도의 개정 필요성
Ⅲ. 개정안의 검토
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

윤진수(Jinsu Yune). (2013).유치권 및 저당권설정청구권에 관한 민법개정안. 민사법학, (63-1), 193-234

MLA

윤진수(Jinsu Yune). "유치권 및 저당권설정청구권에 관한 민법개정안." 민사법학, .63-1(2013): 193-234

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제