의학교육에 대한 의과대학 교육자의 만족도 조사

• 영문명: Are Medical Educators Satisfied with Educational Environment and Their Practice in Medical Schools?
• 발행기관: 한국의학교육학회
• 저자명: 김창엽(Chang Yup Kim) 김선민(Sun mean Kim) 서정돈(Jung Don Seo) 엄융의(Yung E Earm) 안윤옥(Yoon Ok Ahn) 김성권(Suhng g
• 간행물 정보: 『Korean Journal of Medical Education』제9권 제1호, 37~53쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1997.05.31

영문 초록

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate undergraduate medical education in Korea, we investigated educators satisfaction. Also analysis of the factors affecting educator satisfaction was intended. SUBJECTS: Of the entire educators(4,683 persons) of all medical schools, 585 persons were sampled systematically, based on the published list of medical educators. Of the sampled target, 275 persons(47.5%) responded. METHODS: We developed the questionnaire, asking educators satisfaction on six categories of medical education in terms of educational input and process; educator, facilities and equipments, educational contents, educational method and skill, the evaluation of students, and the performance of students. The questionnaire were mailed to each educator and returned back for analysis. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction of educators was rather low. In particular, educators were more dissatisfied with avaliability of assistant personnel and general environment for education. As for the contents of medical education, they were more dissatisfied with the clinical training in bedside setting. Geographically, educators in the kangwon and chungcheong area had more discontent than others. Educators of private schools were more satisfied with the facilities than those of public ones. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to develop continuous program that evaluate and improve the quality of medical education. Among them the clerkship and general environment for education would be focused. Periodic assessment of educators satisfaction would be a tool to ensure more concern for quality of medical education.

목차

서론

조사대상 및 방법

조사결과

고찰

요약

참고문헌

키워드

Medical education Educator satisfaction Evaluation