본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

Current Use of Depression Rating Scales in Mental Health Setting

이용수 10

영문명
발행기관
대한신경정신의학회
저자명
EunJeong Lee JungBum Kim ImHee Shin KyungHee Lim SangHee Lee GyungAh Cho HyungMo Sung SungWon Jung M
간행물 정보
『Psychiatry Investigation』제7권 제3호, 170~176쪽, 전체 7쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 정신과학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2010.09.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Objective-This study was to investigate the current use of depression rating scales by psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in Korea. Methods-The questionnaires from many psychiatrists and clinical psychologists were included in the analysis. The questionnaire was composed of items about examining the percentage of patients clinically using depression rating scales, reasons for not use of them, the degree of satisfaction, the perceived agreement rate between the result of depression rating scales and doctor’s clinical interview in the evaluation of patients with depressive symptoms. Data were analyzed by χ2 and independent t-test. Results-The clinical use of depression rating scales was more frequent in the psychologists than in the psychiatrists. The purposes for using depression rating scales were assessed into six areas, there was no significant difference in between two groups, and both groups po-inted out their purpose as rating of severity and screening. The reasons for not using scales were that their interview may be sufficient for diagnosis and assessment of depressive patients and they are not familiar with the use of depression rating scales. The psychiatrists usually prefer the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Symptom Checklist 90-Revision (SCL-90-R) in order of frequency, and the clinical psychologists are more likely to use the BDI, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and SCL-90-R. Overall rate of satisfaction in the use of the scales was 67.29±14.45% and overall perceived agreement rate was 70.89±16.45%. Conclusion-Currently used depression rating scales at the clinical practice were not various. Therefore, to heighten clinicians’ utility of these depression rating scales measures, either educational efforts or advertisements, or both, will be necessary to spread them wildly.

목차

INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

EunJeong Lee,JungBum Kim,ImHee Shin,KyungHee Lim,SangHee Lee,GyungAh Cho,HyungMo Sung,SungWon Jung,M. (2010).Current Use of Depression Rating Scales in Mental Health Setting. Psychiatry Investigation, 7 (3), 170-176

MLA

EunJeong Lee,JungBum Kim,ImHee Shin,KyungHee Lim,SangHee Lee,GyungAh Cho,HyungMo Sung,SungWon Jung,M. "Current Use of Depression Rating Scales in Mental Health Setting." Psychiatry Investigation, 7.3(2010): 170-176

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제