학술논문
Current Use of Depression Rating Scales in Mental Health Setting
이용수 10
- 영문명
- 발행기관
- 대한신경정신의학회
- 저자명
- EunJeong Lee JungBum Kim ImHee Shin KyungHee Lim SangHee Lee GyungAh Cho HyungMo Sung SungWon Jung M
- 간행물 정보
- 『Psychiatry Investigation』제7권 제3호, 170~176쪽, 전체 7쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 정신과학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.09.30
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Objective-This study was to investigate the current use of depression rating scales by psychiatrists and clinical psychologists in Korea.
Methods-The questionnaires from many psychiatrists and clinical psychologists were included in the analysis. The questionnaire was composed of items about examining the percentage of patients clinically using depression rating scales, reasons for not use of them, the degree of satisfaction, the perceived agreement rate between the result of depression rating scales and doctor’s clinical interview in the evaluation of patients with depressive symptoms. Data were analyzed by χ2 and independent t-test.
Results-The clinical use of depression rating scales was more frequent in the psychologists than in the psychiatrists. The purposes for using depression rating scales were assessed into six areas, there was no significant difference in between two groups, and both groups po-inted out their purpose as rating of severity and screening. The reasons for not using scales were that their interview may be sufficient for diagnosis and assessment of depressive patients and they are not familiar with the use of depression rating scales. The psychiatrists usually prefer the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Symptom Checklist 90-Revision (SCL-90-R) in order of frequency, and the clinical psychologists are more likely to use the BDI, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and SCL-90-R. Overall rate of satisfaction in the use of the scales was 67.29±14.45% and overall perceived agreement rate was 70.89±16.45%.
Conclusion-Currently used depression rating scales at the clinical practice were not various. Therefore, to heighten clinicians’ utility of these depression rating scales measures, either educational efforts or advertisements, or both, will be necessary to spread them wildly.
목차
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
해당간행물 수록 논문
- Association between Estrogen Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Depression in Post-Menopausal Women: A Preliminary Study
- Cholestatic Jaundice Induced by Duloxetine in a Patient with Major Depressive Disorder
- Changes in Cerebral Cortex and Limbic Brain Functions after Short-Term Paroxetine Treatment in Panic Disorder: An [18F]FDG-PET Pilot Study
- Current Use of Depression Rating Scales in Mental Health Setting
- Retrospective Case Series of Aripiprazole Augmentation in Pervasive Developmental Disorders
- Increased Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3β mRNA Level in the Hippocampus of Patients with Major Depression: A Study Using the Stanley Neuropathology Consortium Integrative Database
- Genetic Association Study of the Alpha 7 Nicotinic Receptor (CHRNA7) with the Development of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder in Korean Population
- The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version
- Efficacy and Tolerability of Aripiprazole: A 26-Week Switching Study from Oral Antipsychotics
- Frontal Dysfunction Underlies Depression in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A FDG-PET Study
- Impairment of Concept Formation Ability in Children with ADHD: Comparisons between Lower Grades and Higher Grades
- Psychopharmacological Treatment Status in Outpatients with Bipolar Disorder: A Clinical Survey in Germany
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!