강제입원의 법적 기준에 대한 고찰 : 입원적합성 심사에 참고할 해외 사례의 소개를 포함하여

• 영문명: Contemplation of Legal Criteria of Psychiatric Compulsory Admission : Including an Introduction of US Case Which Can be Referred to the Assessment of the Appropriateness of Hospitalization in Korea
• 발행기관: 대한신경정신의학회
• 저자명: 김혜수 안용민 박종익
• 간행물 정보: 『신경정신의학』제57권 제1호, 43~51쪽, 전체 9쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 정신과학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2018.02.28

영문 초록

The Korean Mental Health Act has been radically reformed recently in order to improve psychiatric patients human rights by regulating the compulsory admission process. However, the expert group brought up questions about difficulties in practice and incoherence in its philosophy before the Act was implemented. There are already discussions concerning the next revision of the Act. In such a situation, lessons can be learned from the experiences of other countries. Articles on psychiatric compulsory admission were comprehensively reviewed with the focus on legal criteria, and found that current trends worldwide include a move towards broad diagnostic criteria, use of capacity and treatability test, and treatment in the interest of health rather than safety. In addition, we introduce the Whittington scale, an assessment tool for the appropriateness of hospitalization used in the Connecticut Mental Health Center, US, as a reference for the similar procedure being implemented soon in Korea

목차

서론

강제입원의 기준

입원적합성

고찰

Notes

References

키워드

강제입원 법적 기준 정신과적 진단 위험성 치료 필요성 의사결정능력 입원적합성 위팅튼 척도