학술논문
精神障碍者와 司法節次 一 그 一般論 및 몇가지 現實的인 問題點들 —
이용수 21
- 영문명
- The Mentally Disabled Defendants and the Legal Procedure — An Overview and the Problems in Practice —
- 발행기관
- 대한신경정신의학회
- 저자명
- 孫容根
- 간행물 정보
- 『신경정신의학』제32권 제1호, 5~13쪽, 전체 9쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 정신과학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 1993.01.30
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
As mental patients receive special treatments in the medical field, they need to be treated
specially in many aspects in the legal field. For a long time, such a special legal treatment
has been known as “Forensic Psychiatry” in abvanced countries. Unfortunately Korean doctors
and judicial officials are not familiar even with the term Forensic Psychiatry. This deplorable
situation has led me to write this article to draw the interest in the Forensic Psychiatry area
and to facilitate the cooperation between medical and judicial fields.
At first we must recognize the problems of different terminology. Since the law involves
quite different terminology from that of the medicine, the comprehension and adoption of
such legal terms to the medicine field should be done carefully. I will provide the definition
for some terminology in this paper.
In Korean judicial procedures, the problems in mental disability law practice are summarized
as follow s:
1) Expert Witness Cost
The expert witness cost is a kind of a procedural cost to the borne by defendant under
the Rule of Korean Criminal Procedure. In practice, however, the government pays for the
cost. Thus, it would be better to revise the article of the Criminal Procedure governing the
expert witness cost to shift the cost burden from the defendant to the government. If not
we must follow the Rule completely.
Another problem is, then, how to pay for this cost. The budget for the Korean court system
is under the control of the Supreme Court Administration. Thus, short-budgeted lower courts
sometimes cannot afford to provide expert opinion opportunities to defendants with an alleged
mental disability. To insure the fairness and jusitice, every lower court should be able to budget
for the expert witness cost.
2) Forensic Psychiatry Institution
The psychiatric examination of a defendant requires a special detention facility. However,
there had been virtually no reliable mental hospital for this special purpose. Fortunately this
problem can be solved easily after the government established the Forensic Psychiatry Institution.
Practicing lawyers in Korea should recognize the need for special detention facility for
the psychiatric examination.
3) Expert Opinion Evidence
For Korean judges and prosecutors, accepting expert opinions as fact is a rule, rather an
exception. That does not mean the courts accept the expert opinions blindfold. The courts
use and do need to use demeanor evidence to determine the reliability of the evidence. However,
when there is a conflict between an independant psychiatric examination report presented
by the defendant and a court-requested psychiatric examination report, deference to expert
opinions is needed to prevent subjective determination of the court.
4) Civil Procedure and Psychiatric Examination
In Korea, medical examination for a lawsuit rarely includes a psychiatric examination. Even
practicing attorneys consider the medical examination is an exclusive term for a physical examination
rather than the psychiatric one. The advanced legal culture requires to recognize the
importance of the psychiatric examination as one of the medical examinations.
5) Preference for the Mentally Weak Decision
Under the Korean Criminal Code, mentally weak defendants can be sentenced to jail, while
mentally disabled defendants are considered unable to commit a crime. This has made the
courts prefer to find a defendant mentally weak instead of mentally disabled despite a “mentally
disabled” finding, when a heinous crime is in trial. This tendency o f the courts should be
changed because when a defendant is found mentally disabled, he still has to serve his time
in different form for he is confined to a psychiatric detention center under the Social Protection
Law of 1980.
To remedy all these problems and to ascertain the reasonable treatment for the mentally
disabled defendants, the cooperation between the medical a
목차
글 머 리 에
精神障碍者의 法的取扱
특히 刑事法分野와 精神障碍者
몇가지 現實的인 問題點들
글 끝 에
後 言主
References
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 단순 포진성 뇌염의 발병후 관찰된 인지 및 행동장애 1예
- 노인환자에 있어서 인지기능 및 기타 임상증상의 치료경과에 따른 변화에 대한 연구 - 기능성 정신장애군과 기질성 정신장애군을 비교하여 -
- 양성 및 음성 증상 정신분열병 환자에서 혈장 Dopamine-P-hydroxylase 활성도에 관한 연구
- 회피성 인격장애의 치료
- 육군 병사에서 복무기간에 따른 무감정언어증 (Alexithymia) 경향의 차이
- 정신의학과 윤리
- 병원 교대근무자의 야간수면의 주관적 특성
- 양성 및 음성 정신분열병 환자의 손잡이에 관한 연구
- 육군간부들의 정신장애에 대한 인식과 태도 조사
- 지역 사회의 치매 유병율 조사에서 선별 검사(Screening Test) 의 의의
- 精神障碍者와 司法節次 一 그 一般論 및 몇가지 現實的인 問題點들 —
- 성전환증 환자에 대한 임상적 연구
- 만성알콜의존이 촉각-공간적 수행도와 기억력에 미치는 신경심리학적 영향
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!