본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

공동거주자 사이의 의사불일치와 주거침입죄

이용수 40

영문명
Co-resident disagreements and home invasion
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
김지연(Jiyoun Kim)
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第35卷 第1號, 69~96쪽, 전체 28쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2024.06.30
6,160

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

The meaning of home is special. It is not only a physical living space, but also a place where individuals shape their personality and realize their self, and a social space where they share their lives with other members. Home invasion should be a crime that reflects these meanings and characteristics of residential space to fulfill the purpose of the Code. This is also true for buildings that are used by multiple people and where social relationships are formed. In particular, cases of residential or premises trespass arising from disagreements between co-residents regarding access to a dwelling or building are often the result of internal conflicts between co-residents, such as domestic discord, domestic violence, and contentious behavior. The court's judgment on whether a person is guilty of residential or premises trespass directly or indirectly affects his or her life and social relationships. Therefore, the court should consider the impact on various conflicting relationships when forming the jurisprudence on home invasion, but the residential trespass and premises trespass cases decided by the Supreme Court lack such consideration. In the future, when conflicts between co-residents arise and the question of whether the offense of home invasion can be established, the following points should be considered When setting the limits of the duty of care in domestic violence situations, the perspective of protecting domestic violence victims should be reflected, and the limits of the duty of care and social norms should not be different standards for the same act. In addition, since co-residents enjoy a strong legal position that they cannot be the criminal subject of the crime of home invasion, it should be avoided to extend the status of co-residents to outsiders. In the case of legitimate strike behavior, the law should move towards ensuring legitimate strike behavior by denying the establishment of the crime of trespassing even in relation to third parties.

영문 초록

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 공동거주자의 법적 지위
Ⅲ. 공동거주관계의 형성과 해소
Ⅳ. 공동거주자간 의사불일치의 해결
Ⅴ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김지연(Jiyoun Kim). (2024).공동거주자 사이의 의사불일치와 주거침입죄. 법학연구, 35 (1), 69-96

MLA

김지연(Jiyoun Kim). "공동거주자 사이의 의사불일치와 주거침입죄." 법학연구, 35.1(2024): 69-96

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제