학술논문
Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications
이용수 4
- 영문명
- Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications
- 발행기관
- 한국공공가치학회
- 저자명
- Ja-Chun Seok
- 간행물 정보
- 『Journal of Public Value』Vol. 6, 85~92쪽, 전체 8쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 사회복지학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2023.12.31
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Purpose: This study explores its implications by categorizing existing models related to multicultural policies more concisely. There are four types of existing multicultural policy-related models. In other words, it is divided into Differential Exclusionary Model, Assimilation Model, Multiculturalism Model, Cultural Pluralism Model. If the common issues underlying the four models are analyzed and then structured based on the issues, it is expected that a more concise and clear multicultural policy-related model can be derived.
Method: Four models are re-categorized, focusing on common issues. Based on the re-categorized results, it is named to match the characteristics of the model. After deriving a newly re-categorized and named model, its implications are explored.
Results: A common issue lies at the base of the existing four models related to multicultural policy. A common issue is how to establish the relationship between diversity and integration. Differential Exclusionary Model and Assimilation Model share the view that diversity undermines integration. This point of view can be named ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’. On the other hand, Multiculturalism Model and Cultural Pluralism Model share the view that diversity and integration can coexist. This perspective can be categorized as Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model.
Conclusion: Existing multicultural policy-related models can be re-categorized into ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’ and ‘Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model’. In the ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’, diversity and integration are set as incommensurable domains. In the ‘Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model’, diversity and integration are set as commensurable domains. Furthermore, using a series of strategies, ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’ can be transformed to ‘Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model’.
목차
1. 서론
2. 차별 배제 모형과 동화주의 모형 사이의 공통 쟁점
3. 다문화주의와 문화 다원주의 모형 사이의 공통 쟁점
4. 다문화 정책 관련 모형 재범주화의 함의
5. 결론
6. References
해당간행물 수록 논문
- Journal of Public Value Vol. 6 목차
- Developing Training Courses about Spiritual Leadership in Higher Education in Thailand: Critical Review
- The Interrelationship of Moral Education and Human Rights: How are moral education and human rights related?
- Toward Ethical Deployment of Social Robots in Education
- Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications
- The Rapid Emergence of Autonomous Weapons (AWS) and its Ethical Challenges
- A Study on the Difference between Western Entrepreneurship and K-Entrepreneurship
- Korean Traditional Thoughts and Moral Education
- Effect of the Korean Adolescents’ Personal Trust on Social Trust and Public Trust
- Development Process of Unification Education Policy: Focusing on University and Society
- Character Education in Korean Military
참고문헌
관련논문
사회과학 > 사회복지학분야 BEST
- 코로나19로 인한 일상생활의 변화가 코로나블루에 미치는 영향
- 우리나라 저출산의 문제점과 개선방안
- 청소년의 학교생활부적응에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구 : 학교부적응 청소년들을 중심으로
사회과학 > 사회복지학분야 NEW
- 중독회복자의 심리적 고통과 삶의 질 관계에서 회복자본의 매개효과
- 신입 사회복지사의 전공역량에 대한 성찰적 평가 연구
- 사회복지전담공무원의 메타역량, 직무역량, 직무몰입 간 관계에 관한 탐색적 연구
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!