본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications

이용수 4

영문명
Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications
발행기관
한국공공가치학회
저자명
Ja-Chun Seok
간행물 정보
『Journal of Public Value』Vol. 6, 85~92쪽, 전체 8쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 사회복지학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2023.12.31
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Purpose: This study explores its implications by categorizing existing models related to multicultural policies more concisely. There are four types of existing multicultural policy-related models. In other words, it is divided into Differential Exclusionary Model, Assimilation Model, Multiculturalism Model, Cultural Pluralism Model. If the common issues underlying the four models are analyzed and then structured based on the issues, it is expected that a more concise and clear multicultural policy-related model can be derived. Method: Four models are re-categorized, focusing on common issues. Based on the re-categorized results, it is named to match the characteristics of the model. After deriving a newly re-categorized and named model, its implications are explored. Results: A common issue lies at the base of the existing four models related to multicultural policy. A common issue is how to establish the relationship between diversity and integration. Differential Exclusionary Model and Assimilation Model share the view that diversity undermines integration. This point of view can be named ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’. On the other hand, Multiculturalism Model and Cultural Pluralism Model share the view that diversity and integration can coexist. This perspective can be categorized as Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model. Conclusion: Existing multicultural policy-related models can be re-categorized into ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’ and ‘Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model’. In the ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’, diversity and integration are set as incommensurable domains. In the ‘Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model’, diversity and integration are set as commensurable domains. Furthermore, using a series of strategies, ‘Conflict between Diversity and Integrity Model’ can be transformed to ‘Coexistence between Diversity and Integrity Model’.

목차

1. 서론
2. 차별 배제 모형과 동화주의 모형 사이의 공통 쟁점
3. 다문화주의와 문화 다원주의 모형 사이의 공통 쟁점
4. 다문화 정책 관련 모형 재범주화의 함의
5. 결론
6. References

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

Ja-Chun Seok. (2023).Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications. Journal of Public Value, (), 85-92

MLA

Ja-Chun Seok. "Recategorization of Multicultural Policy Models and Its Implications." Journal of Public Value, (2023): 85-92

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제