수도권 규제완화 주장에 대한 반론

• 영문명: A Study on the Counter-argument for Deregulation to Capital Region
• 발행기관: 한국지역경제학회
• 저자명: 고영구
• 간행물 정보: 『한국지역경제연구』제4권 제2호, 53~68쪽, 전체 16쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 경제학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.12.30

영문 초록

There has been a hot debate between the regulationist and deregulationist stances regarding regional policy for the capital region. The people who support the demolition of strict regulation in the capital region tend to understate the effect of the development restriction policy on regional balance, highlighting the frog-flight of capital by which the development regulation in the capital region would stimulate domestic capital to transfer overseas. Since the 1960s, a variety of policy measures have been employed to implement development restriction over the capital region, with their intensity of restriction being fluctuated. Then, it is concluded that development regulation in the capital region should be sustained to reduce the gaps in economic prosperity between the capital region and the lagging regions. In addition, more investment needs to be forwarded toward the neighboring regions. In particular, it is recommended that the neighboring regions still attempt to attract a large amount of manufacturing activities, while the capital region is specialized in international functions and cultural industries.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 수도권 집중과 지배구조 실태

Ⅲ. 수도권 규제완화 조치와 논리

Ⅳ. 수도권 규제완화론의 한계와 문제점

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

수도권 규제 지역균형 낙후지역 capital region regulation regional balance lagging regions