论行政规范性文件司法附带审查的性质

• 영문명: On the Nature of Judicial Review of Administrative Normative Documents
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소
• 저자명: 赵清林(Zhao Qinglin)
• 간행물 정보: 『원광법학』제40권 제1호, 149~160쪽, 전체 12쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2024.03.30

국문 초록

行政规范性文件的行政和法律双重属性决定了对于行政规范性文件客观上存在两种不同性质的司法审查，即行政审判性审查和法律适用性审查。从审查条件和审查后的处理来看，现行《行政诉讼法》规定的行政规范性文件司法审查只能算是法律适用性审查。法律适用性审查，乃是司法审判的题中应有之义，并非行政诉讼特有问题，也并非仅仅针对行政规范性文件，不宜在《行政诉讼法》中特别规定，而应在《宪法》或《法院组织法》中规定。从法律适用性审查的角度来看，现行法规定的依申请审查和对行政规范性文件的制定权限、制定程序的审查，也存在问题。最后，法律适用性审查无法发挥对行政规范性文件进行法制监督的功能，对于行政规范性文件，我国仍需进一步考虑确立行政审判性司法审查的必要性与可能性。

영문 초록

Administrative Normative Documents are simultaneously administrative and legal which determines that there are objectively two different types of judicial review for administrative normative documents, namely administrative trial review and legal applicability review. From the perspective of review conditions and results, the judicial review of administrative normative documents stipulated in the current Administrative Litigation Law can only be considered as a legal applicability review. The legal applicability review is a necessary part of judicial trial, and is not a unique issue in administrative litigation. It is not only related to administrative normative documents and should not be specifically stipulated in the Administrative Litigation Law, but should be stipulated in the Constitution or the Court Organization Law. From the perspective of legal applicability review, there are also many problems in the current law regarding the intensity and procedures of judicial review. Finally, the legal applicability review cannot fulfill the function of legal supervision over administrative normative documents. China still needs to consider the necessity and possibility of establishing some kind of administrative trial review.

목차

一、行政规范性文件

二、两种性质的司法审查

三、我国行政规范性文件司法附带审查的性质

四、性质论视野下行政规范性文件司法附带审查程序与规则之检视

五、代结语

키워드

行政规范性文件 司法审查 法律适用 Administrative normative documents judicial review legal application