학술논문
‘절차의 남용’ 개념 고찰과 국제해양법재판소 기후변화 권고적 의견 사건에 대한 우려 검토
이용수 142
- 영문명
- The Concept of ‘Abuse of Process’ and the ITLOS Climate Change Advisory Opinion Proceeding
- 발행기관
- 국제법평론회
- 저자명
- 조훈(Hoon Cho)
- 간행물 정보
- 『국제법평론』제67호, 75~109쪽, 전체 35쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2024.02.28
7,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

국문 초록
영문 초록
In the actual judicial proceedings including the advisory opinion process, we may frequently face criticisms and concerns about the ‘abuse of process’ raised on certain cases. The pending advisory opinion proceeding before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (‘ITLOS’) regarding climate change is the same. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (‘UNCLOS’) does not explicitly stipulate the advisory jurisdiction of the ITLOS over other than sea-bed matters. Instead, Article 138 of the Rules of the ITLOS stipulates that the tribunal can give an advisory opinion on a legal question if an international agreement related to the purposes of UNCLOS specifically provides for the request for an advisory opinion to the tribunal. In this respect, some authors have raised that making an agreement and establishing a body for the purpose of asking for an advisory opinion of the ITLOS pursuant to Article 138 of the Rules of the Tribunal may constitute an abuse of process. While it is quite common to observe claims and criticisms about such abuse, especially in cases where politically sensitive questions are at issue, the concept of the abuse of process itself has rarely been scrutinised in detail. Thus, the purpose of this article is to explore the concept of the abuse of process both theoretically and practically. Hence, this article first explores how to understand this concept by suggesting essential constituents. On the basis of such findings, next, this article examines the applicability of this concept to the pending climate change advisory proceeding and inspects some underlying uncertainties and difficulties. Then, lastly, this article assesses why such concerns have been raised over the current proceeding, and what role that the ITLOS should take in facing those controversial procedural questions.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 절차의 남용 개념에 대한 이론적 검토
Ⅲ. ITLOS 기후변화 권고적 의견사건에 대한 적용 검토
Ⅳ. 평가 - 절차의 남용 우려 제기의 배경
Ⅴ. 결 론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
법학 > 법학분야 NEW
- 가상자산(암호화폐 등)의 법적 성질과 민사집행
- 부당한 장래적 판례변경 - 대법원 2024. 12. 19. 선고 2020다247190, 2023다302838 전원합의체 판결
- 소송법상 특별대리인
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!
