본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

[특집] 경제력과 국가안보

이용수 0

영문명
Economics and National Security: Korean Security and East Asian Security after the Economic Crisis of 1997
발행기관
한국전략문제연구소
저자명
유현석
간행물 정보
『전략연구』통권 제22호, 106~137쪽, 전체 32쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 정치외교학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2001.07.31
6,640

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This study examines the relationship between economics and national security with the case of national security in Korea after the economic crisis of 1997. The main question is what kind of impact the economic crisis of 1997 has had on Korean national security. This study consists of three parts. First part examines the impact of the economic crisis of 1997 on military security of Korea. Main focus is on the domestic dynamics in Korean political economy after the crisis. Second part deals with the economic security of Korea after the crisis. Part three examines how has the crisis of 1997 which was regional phenomenon, affected the regional security in East Asia and in turn the national security of Korea. This study draws three main conclusions. First of all, the economic crisis of 1997 had negative impact on the military security of Korea by eroding material base of national security. The sharp decrease of defence budget caused by the economic crisis was the major blow to the Korea's military security. However, this study wants to emphasize that the more critical impact of the economic crisis on the Korean national security was that the economic crisis provided the atmosphere in which people could questioned existing budget priority to military security-related matters over other social necessities. There has been a taboo in Korea on questioning the defence budget due to the confrontational situation in the Korean peninsular. The emergence of imminent social and economic problems triggered the conflict over the budget allocation and the voice that demand budget priority to socioeconomic over military matters began to receive widen popular support. The second conclusion is that the economic security has been eroded significantly by the economic crisis and the efforts to overcome it. The Korean economy has been opened up in the efforts to attract more foreign capital. Unlike the military security which can be improved as the economic condition improved, the economic security is hard to improved since the strocture and the way the Korean economy operates changed fundamentally. Especially, the sensitivity and vulnerability of the Korean economy has sjgnificantly increased as the foreign economic forces began to play more important role than ever. In short, as the result of the economic crisis of 1997, economic security has been severely weakened and also it provided the opportunity to realize the importance of non-military security. Finally, the economic crisis which swept most of East Asian countries did not seen to alter existing power balance among major actors in East Asian international relations. The United States still assumes hegemonic status in the region and Japan is continuing her efforts to improve its political and military position in the region in spite of severe economic difficulties. Despite of this continuity, there have been two important changes in perception politics in East Asian international relations. First, in the course of overcoming economic crisis, the negative perception toward the United States spread among East Asian countries including the Korea. The United States was perceived as representative of Western economic actors such as international financial institutions and Western banks and investors. Born Asian leaders criticized that the United States take advantage of helpless Asia countries in order to expand her economic and political influence in the region. This resentment toward the United States awakened Asian countries and helped the formation of Asian identity. Whereas the U.S. actions caused resentment, China stood to gain influence by providing needed leadership. All these development could trigger the change of regional order in East Asia. Especially, if the China wants to use this situation as the opportunity to expand her influence in the region including over the Korea, that would cause tension between the U.S and China.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 경제력과 안보: 이론적 논의와 분석틀의 모색
Ⅲ. 경제위기 이후의 한국안보: 국내적 요인을 중심으로
Ⅳ. 경제위기와 동북아 안보
Ⅴ. 결론:경제위기의 안보적 함의

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

유현석. (2001).[특집] 경제력과 국가안보. 전략연구, (), 106-137

MLA

유현석. "[특집] 경제력과 국가안보." 전략연구, (2001): 106-137

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제