한국어 ‘-ㄴ 것이다’ 구문과 중국어 ‘是……的’ 구문의 대조 연구

• 영문명: A comparative study on the construction ‘-eun keosita’ in Korean and the construction ‘shì……de’ in Chinese
• 발행기관: 이중언어학회
• 저자명: 손욱
• 간행물 정보: 『이중언어학』제86호, 145~170쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.03.31

영문 초록

The study analyzes the similarities and differences between two constructions, ‘-eun keosita’ in Korean and ‘shì……de’ in Chinese, to shed light on the corresponding relationship between these two constructions. The construction ‘-eun keosita’ can be divided into three types. Type 1 is composed by ‘keos’ which has the function of reference and ‘ita’ which marks the identity relation. Type 2 is composed by the ‘keos’ complement clause and the copula ‘ita’. Type 3 of ‘-eun keosita’ is used as an idiomatic expression, which has the modality meaning of “emphasizing the established facts”. The construction ‘shì… …de’ also can be divided into three types: judgment construction, emphasis construction and affirmative construction. In the case of the judgment construction, ‘shì’ is a copula and ‘de’ is a structural auxiliary. In the cases of the emphasis construction and the affirmative construction, ‘shì’ is a modal adverb and ‘de’ is a modal particle. When ‘shì……de’ is deleted, the emphasis construction and the affirmative construction can be distinguished according to whether the meaning of the perfect is maintained. When comparing the construction of ‘-eun keosita’ and ‘shì……de’, it has been found that Type 1 of ‘-eun keosita’ corresponds with the judgment construction of ‘shì……de’. But when the subject is a person, Type 1 of ‘-eun keosita’ does not correspond with the judgment construction of ‘shì…… de’. In addition, Type 2 of ‘-eun keosita’ does not correspond with the construction of ‘shì……de’. Type 3 corresponds with the affirmative construction of ‘shì…… de’, and at the same time, it also corresponds with the emphasis construction of ‘shì……de’ in particular context. When ‘shì……de’ is used as the meaning of affirmative, it can be used in suppositional contents. But this meaning contradicts with type 3 of ‘-eun keosita’, so they can not replace each other in this case.

목차

1. 서론

2. 한국어 ‘-ㄴ 것이다’ 구문의 유형

3. 중국어 ‘是……的’ 구문의 유형

4. 한국어 ‘-ㄴ 것이다’ 구문과 중국어 ‘是……的’ 구문의 비교

5. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

‘-ㄴ 것이다’ 구문 ‘是……的’ 구문 대조 연구 the construction ‘-eun keosita’ the construction ‘shì……de’ comparative study