무력사용에 관한 유엔헌장 검토

• 영문명: Critical Review on Provision concerning Use of Force on UN Charter
• 발행기관: 국제법평론회
• 저자명: 김회동
• 간행물 정보: 『국제법평론』제66호, 103~131쪽, 전체 29쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2023.10.31

영문 초록

Article 2(4) of the U.N. Charter prohibits the use of force and the threat of force in principle. Only the right to self-defense under Article 51 of the Charter and the use of force approved by the United Nations Security Council are allowed as exceptions. However, there are many differences in the interpretation of Article 2(4), which prohibits the use of force in principle. Traditional interpretation which Professor Brownlie supported is that the use of force should be strictly restricted according to the purpose of the establishment of the United Nations. However, there is also the argument that the use of force should be allowed additionally if it meets the purpose of the United Nations through literal interpretation. In addition, there is an argument that Article 2 (4) should be interpreted through teleological interpretation to settle the situations such as genocide which Professor Reisman, Yale Law school argued. Nevertheless, Aforementioned theories do not provide complete logic to be able to fill a gap between the United Nations' ideology and reality. The gap between Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and reality is not based on the essential flaws of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. For almost 80 years after the signing of the U.N. Charter, the revision of the U.N. Charter has been amended only in procedural matters. The time has come to consider seriously the revision of the United Nations Charter in response to the development of science and technology and the resulting changes in human society. In the case of Article 2, Paragraph 4, the same aspect was encountered.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며

Ⅱ. 유엔헌장 제2조 제4항과 제51조의 해석

Ⅲ. 무력행사와 무력위협

Ⅳ. 우크라이나-러시아 전쟁 관련 검토

Ⅴ. 유엔헌장 제2조 제4항의 본질적 문제점

Ⅵ. 결 론

키워드

유엔헌장 제2조 제4항 무력의 사용 무력의 위협 무력복구 Article 2(4) UN Charter Use of Force Threat of Force Armed Reprisal