학술논문
노인 환자의 전립선비대증에서 TUEB와 HoLEP의 비교 분석
이용수 40
- 영문명
- Comparative Analysis between Transurethral Enucleation with Bipolar and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Consecutive Case
- 발행기관
- 대한임상노인의학회
- 저자명
- 조정현 황춘하 윤종현 성종원 홍준표 박소미 정태욱 박대형 나웅
- 간행물 정보
- 『대한임상노인의학회지』제23권 제2호, 123~130쪽, 전체 8쪽
- 주제분류
- 의약학 > 기타의약학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2022.12.31
4,000원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Background: The study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of transurethral enucleation with bipolar (TUEB) and holmium Laser enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Method: The study was retrospectively analyzed with 132 patients who underwent TUEB (n=53) and HoLEP (n=79) between May 2017 and December 2021. To evaluate the changes of pre- and postoperative urinary symptoms, we measured the peak flow rate (Qmax, mL/s), post-voided residual volume (PVR, mL) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). In addition, we statistically conducted the resected weight (g), resection time (min), resection efficiency (g/min) by the prostate weight into <50, 50-80 and >80 g groups. The urinary catheter reinsertion, urinary tract infection, bladder neck contracture, incontinence, bladder injury and change in hemoglobin correlated with postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: The mean age was 71.0±7.4 years for TUEB group and 71.4±7.4 years for HoLEP group. Prostate resected weight, resection time, and resection efficiency were 46.9±22.1 g, 59.6±30.9 min, 0.81±0.11 g/min in TUEB group respectively and were 49.7±25.9 g, 46.7±25.9 min, 0.79±0.12 g/min in HoLEP group respectively. The resection efficiency had better outcome in TUEB group (0.86±0.12 g/min) than that of HoLEP group (0.67±0.08 g/min) in Subgroup 1 (prostate weight <50 g). In both group, there was pronounced improvement in the IPSS, Qmax and PVR at 3 months after surgery. Any patient was not needed for blood transfusion. Conclusion: Our study suggested that TUEB was not inferior to HoLEP in resection efficiency and postoperative outcome. Also, it may be the best consideration for surgical treatment with BPH patients, especially those with a prostate less than 50 g.
목차
서론
대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
REFERENCES
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!