T. S. 엘리엇과 알프레드 테니슨

• 영문명: T. S. Eliot and Alfred Tennyson: Eliot’s Reception of Tennysonian Canon
• 발행기관: 한국T.S.엘리엇학회
• 저자명: 이철희
• 간행물 정보: 『T. S. 엘리엇연구』제22권 제2호, 239~267쪽, 전체 29쪽
• 주제분류: 어문학 > 영어와문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.12.30

영문 초록

T. S. Eliot is regarded as one of the greatest critics in the last century. As a critic he tends to have strict canonical standards. However, his attitude toward Tennyson seems rather favorable. Of Tennysonian canonical traits, Eliot thinks abundance, variety, and competence are the essence of Tennysonian excellence as a poet. He further feels that Tennyson is highly competent to express himself aptly whatever intention it is in his poetry and prose. It is probably because Tennyson is a master technician in poetry: his poetic language and its skills are rich and varied. He has absorbed all poetic skills, use of words, rhymes, rhythms, as in Maud and In Memoriam. Tennyson’s poetic excellence has already proved in Poems by Two Brothers co-authored with his brother, Frederick. In his criticism on Tennyson, Eliot often makes use of “great,” “wondrous,” or “master,” which he rarely uses when he studies other poets. Besides, it is rather interesting that Tennyson and Eliot are rather well compared: both use dramatic monologues while they withhold expression of personal feelings or emotion. As a poet and critic, Eliot is characterized by objective correlative, impersonality, unified sensibility, which almost parallel Tennyson’s. As a later poet, Eliot must have learned from Tennyson, a great technician of the last century.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며

Ⅱ. 본론

Ⅲ. 나오며

키워드

엘리엇 테니슨 『모오드』 『인 메모리엄』 운율 T. S. Eliot Alfred Lord Tennyson Maud In Memoriam rhyme