본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

브래들리 철학과 엘리엇의 몰개성시론

이용수 0

영문명
Bradley’s Philosophy and Eliot’s Impersonal Theory of Poetry
발행기관
한국T.S.엘리엇학회
저자명
정경심(Kyung Sim Chung)
간행물 정보
『T. S. 엘리엇연구』제17권 제1호, 127~152쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
어문학 > 영어와문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2007.06.30
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Since the publication of Eliot’s doctoral thesis on F.H. Bradley in 1964―written between 1913 and 1916―the relationship between philosophy and poetic theory in Eliot has been questioned. Philosophy and poetics working simultaneously on the same mind inescapably influenced each other, of which. Eliot’s Bradley thesis is evidence, giving many examples taken from his experience as an artwork recipient-creator. Philosophy was an inherent part of Eliot’s impersonality theory from the beginning, providing the foundation for Eliot’s poetic theory. The three most principal ideas of philosophy are Bradley’s doctrine of “immediate experience,” “point of view,” and Eliot’s own concept of “half-object.” The first two were evolved into the literary ideas of “dissociation of sensibility,” “objective correlative,” and “point of view.” The last, an extension of the first two, is Eliot’s definition of art as an experience, which transmigrates from one viewpoint to another. The “Absolute” is the ultimate issue philosophy has to face. Bradley accepted it as an experience that exists beyond relations in our dissociated world. Eliot obviously and irresistibly yearned for the “Absolute,” which was all too apparent in his poetry. But he could not logically endorse it in the thesis. His empirical side at this stage kept him highly skeptical of anything beyond relations until his religious conversion in 1926. Instead, he decided to halt at the frontier of metaphysics and turn to poetry, because for Eliot “emphasis upon practice” is what justifies and “impels us toward the “Absolute.” Eliot’s yearning for the “Absolute” lies behind his turning from philosopher to critic-poet.

목차

I. 철학과 시
II. 『F. H. 브래들리 철학에서 인식과 경험』
III. “절대”를 향한 희구
인용문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정경심(Kyung Sim Chung). (2007).브래들리 철학과 엘리엇의 몰개성시론. T. S. 엘리엇연구, 17 (1), 127-152

MLA

정경심(Kyung Sim Chung). "브래들리 철학과 엘리엇의 몰개성시론." T. S. 엘리엇연구, 17.1(2007): 127-152

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제