학술논문
An Arbitral Case Study on Burden of Proof for Non-Conformity of Goods Under CISG
이용수 7
- 영문명
- An Arbitral Case Study on Burden of Proof for Non-Conformity of Goods Under CISG
- 발행기관
- 한국중재학회
- 저자명
- 김은빈(Eun-Bin Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『중재연구』제32권 제3호, 71~91쪽, 전체 21쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 무역학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2022.09.30
5,320원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The CISG does not stipulate the subject of the burden of proof, and in the arbitral award, the buyer is liable for proof compared to the seller for nonconformity of the product. Without a unified interpretation of the burden of proof of non-contractual goods, confusion of uncertainty may increase if the parties to the sale contract have a dispute due to the trade in goods. It is an important issue to create a unified regulation on this because the courts or arbitration agencies of the Contracting States of the CISG interpret and apply the "seller's obligation to conform to the goods contract" stipulated in this Convention in various ways. In this study, in the case of international Sales of Goods there is a tendency to prefer arbitration through arbitration agencies in the dispute, so the subject of burden of proof is analyzed through arbitration cases applied by CISG as the governing law. Most international commodity trading around the world is regulated by this Convention, but according to the rigid convention regulations, it is analyzed and interpreted through cases where this convention is applied to each country's international arbitration, suggesting the need for a rigid CISG revision.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Conformity of the goods and the Burden of proof
Ⅲ. Case study of the arbitration award on the subject of proof of non-conforming goods
Ⅳ. Conclusion
References
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- An Arbitral Case Study on Burden of Proof for Non-Conformity of Goods Under CISG
- The Status of Damage Relief in the Cosmetics Industry and the ADR System
- The U.S. Supreme Court Limits the Scope of Judicial Assistance in Private International Arbitral Proceedings Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1782 in its Recent Decision of ZF Auto. US, Inc. v. Luxshare, Ltd., 596 U.S. ___ (2022)
- Legal Doctrines for the U.S. Federal Courts and the International Investment Arbitral Tribunals in Adjudicating the Climate Change Disputes
- Public Policy Exception under Russian Law as a Ground for Refusing Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!