Comparative Study of the Requirements for the Buyer’s Right to Require Delivery of Substitute Goods under the CISG and the Korean Civil Act

• 발행기관: 한국무역학회
• 저자명: Yoon Lee
• 간행물 정보: 『Journal of Korea Trade (JKT)』Vol.26 No.1, 81~98쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2022.02.28

영문 초록

Purpose – This study aims to compare the requirements under the United Nations Convention on Contract for the International Sales of Goods (CISG) and the Korean Civil Act (KCA) regarding the buyer’s right to require the delivery of substitute goods. The buyer’s right to demand substitute delivery not only protect them from the seller’s breach of contract but also preserves the contractual bond between the parties by providing an opportunity for sellers to protect their goodwill and circumvent the extreme remedy of avoidance. However, as substitute delivery entails additional efforts and costs for return and re-shipment, this right should not be allowed in every case of defect. Additionally, unlike the CISG, the KCA contains no specific provision related to the requirements for claiming substitute delivery. Therefore, it would be meaningful to examine and compare what requirements should be fulfilled before the buyer exercises the right in relation to non-conforming goods under the CISG and the KCA. Design/methodology – We conducted a comparative study of the requirements under the CISG and the KCA regarding the buyer’s right to require delivery of substitute goods given a seller’s delivery of non-conforming goods. Additionally, we referred to the opinions from the CISG Advisory Council, the draft of the KCA amendment, and related precedents, mainly focusing on the existence and severity of defects, reasonableness, and timely notice and requests as the major requirements for substitute delivery. Findings – The results of this study can be summarized as follows: First, the CISG provides more detailed requirements about the right to require delivery of substitute goods; by contrast, the KCA does not stipulate any such requirement. Thus, specific requirements for substitute delivery should be included when amending the KCA. Second, the CISG attempts to minimize overlapping and conflict with other remedies by specifying detailed requirements for the delivery of substitutes. Third, both the CISG and KCA require reasonableness for substitute delivery. Originality/value – Although there are no explicit legal requirements for substitute delivery under the KCA, there has been relatively little discussion of this issue to date. Therefore, the findings of our study can guide future revisions of the KCA to fill this loophole. Moreover, the recently released CISG Advisory Council opinion that clarifies the continuing confusion and debate, can help distinguish which remedy is suitable for a particular case. It may provide practical advice for businesspeople in international trade as well as legal implications for the future development of the KCA.

목차

1. Introduction

2. Non-conformity of the Goods

3. Reasonableness

4. Timely Notice and Request

5. Others

6. Conclusion

References

키워드

Breach of Contract CISG Korean Civil Act Right to Require Delivery of Substitute Goods