중재의 준거법 선택과 당사자 자치의 제한

• 영문명: The Choice of Ap licable Law and the Limitations of Party Autonomy - Focusing on International Sports Arbitration
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 유소미(So-Mi Yoo)
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제31권 제2호, 23~46쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2021.05.31

영문 초록

Sports disputes have specific characteristics compared to disputes that arise in the field of commerce. One particularity is the judicial system in which the CAS plays a key role as the International Supreme Court for sports-related mat ers. The CAS Code ap lies whenever the parties agre to submit a sports-related dispute to the CAS(Art. R27). Once the parties to the arbitration agre ment have decided that the CAS Code should govern their proce dings. The parties’ autonomy is, however, limited to the provisions of the CAS Code that provide for such a cor esponding autonomy. The ap lication of the mandatory rules contained in the CAS Code can ot be excluded. In CAS appeals arbitration proce dings, the Panel shal decide the dispute ac ording to the ap licable sports regulations and, subsidiarily, to the rules of law chosen by the parties(Art. R58). In international sports disputes, the uniform ap lication and interpretation of the relevant regulations are es ential. Therefore, Art. R58 should be ap lied as a mandatory rule without any changes. Regulations of the sports organizations are to be qualified as valid rules of law. CAS panels may also ap ly the so-cal ed lex sportiva to the merits before considering statutory provisions of national jurisdictions. In this way, the specificities in (international) sports disputes can be taken into ac ount without the ne d to further examine the application of national legal standards.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재절차법 선택에 있어 당사자 자치의 제한

Ⅲ. 실체적 준거법 선택에 있어 당사자 자치의 제한

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

준거법 당사자 자치의 원칙 국제스포츠중재 국제스포츠중재재판소(CAS) 스포츠법(lex sportiva) Ap licable Law Principle of Party Autonomy International Sports Arbitration Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS) lex sportiva