본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

의료과오소송에 있어서 설명·동의에 관한 소고

이용수 9

영문명
A study on the informed consent in the medical malpractice suit
발행기관
한국민사소송법학회
저자명
박민제(Min Je Park / 483)
간행물 정보
『민사소송』제16권 제1호, 483~515쪽, 전체 33쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.05.30
6,760

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In recent times, it is generally recognized that patients must ensure right of self–determination, right to know, consent competency in medical practice. However, in reality, the doctor is expert who has professional knowledge on the medicine field, whereas patients are layperson about medicine. Under these circumstances, it is natural that patients should be in a disadvantageous position in comparison with doctor. In this situation, it is required for the patients to ask various questions about disease, to advocate patient’s right to know. Also, doctor must make sufficient explanations to guarantee patients’ right. Doctor should not manage to escape liability by formal and insincere questions. By setting up a good and trustful doctor–patient relationship, we can prohibit defensive medicine executed by a doctor. At the same time, we can foster more desirable treatment milieu between them. Informed consent is derived from to secure patient’s or participant’s right to self–determination substantially in the field of medical practice and medical research. On the other point of view, some opinions show that it is desirable to restrict informed consent to attenuate psychological burden, in case of participating medical treatment and medical research for the sake of securing patient’s or participant’s self–determination effectively. But this is superficial viewpoint. This is dimensionally different problem. Henceforth, That problem can practically be deduced a conclusion, vice versa, in real medical practice. In conclusion, it should be desirable to acquire informed consent from patients, except for the inevitable circumstances. To this point of view, we should solve this difficult problem rationally.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 환자의 기본적 권리
Ⅲ. 설명·동의의 이념
Ⅳ. 동의능력
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박민제(Min Je Park / 483). (2012).의료과오소송에 있어서 설명·동의에 관한 소고. 민사소송, 16 (1), 483-515

MLA

박민제(Min Je Park / 483). "의료과오소송에 있어서 설명·동의에 관한 소고." 민사소송, 16.1(2012): 483-515

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제